Women Science Professors Discriminated Against?
July 18, 2008 / 4:14 pm • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier
Remember when Larry Summers got raked over the coals because he wondered about women in science? Well the controversy brews still and it has begged a couple questions:
1) Given the slow turnover of faculty and its bad effect on opportunities for young female (and male) scientists, should advocates for more women in science be trying to eliminate tenure? (Some Title Niners have advocated its abolition.)
2) Given the consequences of the law forbidding mandatory retirement of professors, should we think twice about imposing further federal restrictions? Could Title IX become another rigid, one-size-fits-all rule that makes it harder for universities to hire the best young scientists?
Simple answer: 1. Yes and 2. Yes
I’m no feminist, but if my core principles help people achieve freedom and equality and that benefits even harpy women, so be it. Tenure enables underachievers and encourages laziness and should be kicked everywhere. Rules that restrict behavior for the benefit of one special interest group always end up having unintended consequences because, and I’ve said this before, but it bears repeating here, everything the government touches turns to shit.
So women aren’t adequately represented in higher education. The answer isn’t to encourage mediocrity (tenure) and stupid laws (Title IX). The answer is freedom. With freedom, achievement-oriented women will achieve. I know, it’s complicated.
I wonder how feel. I suspect that women who do get tenure, don’t want it to go, either.















