<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liveblogging the Prez &amp; First Lady, Fred Thompson &amp; Joe Lieberman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://melissablogs.com/2008/09/02/liveblogging-the-prez-first-lady-fred-thompson-joe-lieberman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://melissablogs.com/2008/09/02/liveblogging-the-prez-first-lady-fred-thompson-joe-lieberman/</link>
	<description>Information Pollination</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 03:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naqamel</title>
		<link>http://melissablogs.com/2008/09/02/liveblogging-the-prez-first-lady-fred-thompson-joe-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-8682</link>
		<dc:creator>Naqamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melissaclouthier.com/?p=10150#comment-8682</guid>
		<description>Donna Brazille stepped in it on CNN after Lieberman&#039;s speech.
After Lieberman&#039;s speech, where he endorsed McCain and shredded &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grolier.com/wwii/wwii_mussolini.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Barack Hussein Obama&lt;/a&gt;, CNN got comments from Donna Brazille.&lt;/a&gt;
She pointed out that Lieberman agrees with Obama in 95% of the issues, and with McCain 5% of the time.
So if he agrees with Obama that much, Ms. Brazille, why did he endorse McCain?
Could it be that Lieberman sees the same &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalomania&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;character flaws&lt;/a&gt; in Obama that an awful lot of other people do?
The look on the faces on the CNN anchors after Lieberman skewered the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorder&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obamessiah &lt;/a&gt; was priceless. They looked completely deflated.

I wish I could vote for someone I agreed with 95% of the time. The only reason I wouldn&#039;t would be if that person had a deep character flaw.
Fred Thompson&#039;s speech was great. Loved how he nailed Obama for his &quot;above my pay grade&quot; comment at Rick Warren&#039;s forum.
Too bad Obama did so poorly at Warren&#039;s forum. It likely means that the Democrats will never agree to it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna Brazille stepped in it on CNN after Lieberman&#8217;s speech.<br />
After Lieberman&#8217;s speech, where he endorsed McCain and shredded <a href="http://www.grolier.com/wwii/wwii_mussolini.html" rel="nofollow">Barack Hussein Obama</a>, CNN got comments from Donna Brazille.<br />
She pointed out that Lieberman agrees with Obama in 95% of the issues, and with McCain 5% of the time.<br />
So if he agrees with Obama that much, Ms. Brazille, why did he endorse McCain?<br />
Could it be that Lieberman sees the same <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalomania" rel="nofollow">character flaws</a> in Obama that an awful lot of other people do?<br />
The look on the faces on the CNN anchors after Lieberman skewered the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorder" rel="nofollow">Obamessiah </a> was priceless. They looked completely deflated.</p>
<p>I wish I could vote for someone I agreed with 95% of the time. The only reason I wouldn&#8217;t would be if that person had a deep character flaw.<br />
Fred Thompson&#8217;s speech was great. Loved how he nailed Obama for his &#8220;above my pay grade&#8221; comment at Rick Warren&#8217;s forum.<br />
Too bad Obama did so poorly at Warren&#8217;s forum. It likely means that the Democrats will never agree to it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

