I want to know who is behind the hackers. It’s not to say that some smarty-pants kids with too much time on their hands couldn’t do this, but color me skeptical. When all the Lefty talking heads blab about state business being conducted through private email, it appears that the left have far too much to gain by this.

Even if the Obama campaign didn’t directly orchestrate this, they along with the rest of the left bear the blame for creating a “by whatever means necessary” attitude among their increasingly insane followers. I read an excerpt from a Kos post a few days ago explicitly exhorting the koskids to get in the gutter, not only because “the other side does it” but also because it’s just that important for the left to win. They’ve built up a huge boogeyman in the form of George Bush, and they believe that if he isn’t defeated and his policies are not immediately undone, then America – nay, the world – is doomed.

Ask yourself what you would have done in 1933 to stop Hitler had you known what he was up to. This is how the left sees the GOP in general and Bush in particular. So, is it any surprise that they would stoop to hacking Palin’s private e-mail or smearing her family or offering her daughter money to abort her baby? For the left, nothing less than the world is at stake. They think we are teetering on the brink of the establishment of a Christian/fascist/warmonger regime that will inaugurate a new dark age. They feel that they have to stop it… by any means necessary.

Hacking email accounts is not exactly Obama’s style.

Wrong. Obama is the product of the Chicago Machine, and this kind of thing is exactly what the Chicago Machine does.

The real story is that Palin is ignorant enough to use a highly hackable web account for state business.

Bzzzt. She wasn’t using it for State Business, and as far as being ignorant, I suppose you think everyone with a Yahoo webmail account is ignorant. Way to paint millions of people with the same bunch, you tolerant, accepting liberal, you.

So when you pose the question “how low will they go,” know that the “they” in question is most likely some smart 16 year old kid in his parents basement in Bayonne, New Jersey.

And this 16 year old is mistakenly believing the MSM hype about Obama being a secular messiah. But that’s not even the case.

Anonymous is a fairly infamous hacking group, and in order to hack Yahoo there was far more expertise needed than some pimply-faced script kiddie would have in his parents basement.

Anonymous has a history of left-wing ‘Hackitivism’ – previously illegally obtaining sensitive material on Guantanamo Bay and posting it to wiki-leaks.

So your attempt to paint this as one lone 16 year old kid only exposes how ignorant you are of the realities of the situation.

If anybody is being sleazy in this race, it’s McCain for claiming such absurdities as Obama wants sex education for young kids, when Obama’s proposal wants to train the teachers of young children to recognize child abuse.

Here’s how well that idea is working in Austraila. If you want 2nd graders giving hummers to 3rd graders in school, then Obama’s your man.

Even Nixon heir apparent Carl Rove has said publically that McCain has gone too far in his venomous attacks. Meanwhile, the reason people react so vicerally to Sarah Palin is so obvious it hardly needs mention. Dum dum dum dum.

The reason liberals react so viscerally (learn to spell, moonbat) to Saracuda is they see her as a threat that must be neutralized. See “Chicago Machine”. Palin threatens the liberal elite.

Hmm. You attempted to make 4 points, and failed at all 4.

Have a nice day!

BTW, the co-sponsor of that harmless bill, which ONLY sought to help teachers fight sexual molestation of children, agrees that it was a sex ed bill. Byron York of National Review spoke with State Senator Iris Martinez:

After we discussed other aspects of the bill, I told Martinez that reading the bill, I just didn’t see it as being exclusively, or even mostly, about inappropriate touching. “I didn’t see it that way, either,” Martinez said. “It’s just more information about a whole variety of things that have to go into a sex education class, the things that are outdated that you want to amend with things that are much more current.”

So, I asked, you didn’t see it specifically as being about inappropriate touching?

“Absolutely not.”

http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=NzI3ZDUzOTE0ZThlMTU3MTY0MDI4ZTY0MTZhY2I2MGY=

The part of blame must go to Ms.Palin.

It is very very naive of her, being a high profile person, to use a public email like yahoo.

Even the People in Administration need few basic lessons in IT.

Naqamel ,You proclaim and think like one of the liberal bloggers , who label any entity that dares to disagree with them as “Moral Police”.

I never absolved the hacker of all the blame. He must be punished for this crime.

Public e-mail accounts are notoriously insecure, all the VIP’s must keep away from it.

It is akin to hiring a security for personal protection.

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-voted-for-sex-ed-for-kindergartners

This is the link that you need. To all of you liberals who refuse to realize that the contents of McCain’s ad were TRUE, it is all there for you to see.

So who is the liar now?

Классный у вас сайт, удачи в развитии!

Уматоватовая штука…!