Boomers & Barack

October 14, 2008 / 3:53 pm • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

How much of the Barack Obama lovefest is rooted in Baby Boomer narcissism? That’s the question that occurred to me while contemplating why so many in the generation ahead of mine seemed so excited and irrationally so, about Barack Obama or even Hillary Clinton becoming president. The worship takes turns both comical and disturbing. The mindless devotion has undermined any notion of media fairness–maybe irreparably so. Yet they don’t care.

The quick answer: Boomers view Barack Obama as the symbolic fulfillment of an ideology put forth when they were conducting love-ins and peace protests (that weren’t very peaceful). Fighting for civil rights and equal rights and pacifism and free love, the radicals and idealists dreamed of a future where a person like Barack Obama exists. Their efforts resulted in a man like Barack Obama.

Barack Obama is the child of Kenyan socialist and sociologist who was a 17 year old teen-mother (soft treatment here)–an idealogue and an intellectual. He is biracial. His parents divorced. And he was raised, for a time, by a single mother. He received an elite education. He was schooled in the best institutions of higher learning.

In short, his success illustrates the rightness of the Left’s ideology. Barack Obama is a confirmation of the hippies’ hopes of change. Before the Boomers pass from this life into the next, they want to see the evidence of their rightness. Nothing would be better than a man like Barack Obama as president. The point is, it doesn’t have to be Barack Obama–the who doesn’t matter so much. It’s what he represents that matters. Barack Obama represents a physical manifestation of what the Boomers were talkin’ about when they were talkin’ ’bout my generation.

The only thing standing between the hope and changiness came from a Boomer herself, Hillary Clinton. Both candidates represent a struggle to overcome prejudice and discrimination. Both carry with them the symbolism of a generation’s dreams coming to fruition. This explains the outrage by the women following Hillary who were offended by the Obama campaign’s shameless sexism and misogyny. That the Left employs homophobic and misogynstic tactics doesn’t surprise conservatives. In fact, it was amusing to watch the identity politics crowd tie themselves into knots trying not to state the obvious.

Still, it is clear that for the Boomers, this fight feels as real as when they were 18, wide-eyed and hoping to change the world. For the next generation, the Generation X’ers, the angst and eagerness doesn’t feel as acute. In fact, in a world where, as Kenny Rogers sings, the best rapper is white and the best golfer is black, American culture feels pretty darn post-racial and post-gender. At least that seems true to anyone 45 and younger.

One reason Barack Obama receives little press scrutiny and in fact, loads of press-love, is because so many of these pundits cut their teeth on identity politics and dreamed an impossible dream. Well, this election it’s possible. Barack Obama’s rhetoric about this time and this place and he’s the dream, blah, blah, blah, means so much to them because it’s about them. Their marches mattered. Their free love is justified. Single parents can raise great kids. Education changes lives.

Of course the truth is far more nuanced. And while no one is claiming that sexism or racism is non-existent, it surely doesn’t define American culture these days. It’s interesting to note the generational differences. When charges of racism have been lobbed at Governor Palin she ignores them and goes after Obama as a peer. Joe Biden in contrast, looked perpetually pained interacting with Sarah Palin. It’s a generational thing that revealed that he saw a woman first and then a politician. Most younger people see both Palin and Obama as politicians who happen to be a white woman and a bi-racial man.

For Boomers, electing Barack Obama is about them, not him. They feel so invested not in the candidate, but in themselves. These politics are personal and pathologically so. Should Obama lose, his supporters lose a chance to manifest their dreams for a generation. They act as though the opportunity would never come again, but that’s patently absurd. The fact is, the hippies want to drive the multi-culti, equal rights, liberal car while they’re still young enough to enjoy it. Barak Obama is just one more hippie-to-yuppie acquisition. It’s all about them.

  • Lori

    As a conservative Boomer, I mourn for the future my children will inherit from my generation. We messed so many things up… I hope we (or they) get a chance to fix it even if Socialism takes root.

  • http://dumbblonde.tv Ann

    LOL! Your analysis is so far off the mark it’s funny. It’s not even an analysis – it’s a word salad. Barack as confirmation of hippie’s hopes…oh, please. If you weren’t there, don’t tell us what it was. Peaceful protests not so peaceful? Guess who had the fire hoses and the guns? Not the protesters. Guess who killed? Not the protesters. Don’t blame those who wanted to stop a war that should not have started. Look up your history before you spew it out with righteous indignation that is full of narcissistic know it all. You don’t know it all, and you certainly don’t speak for an entire generation – no one does – we are not all the same any more than your generation speaks with one voice. I see you make fun of intellectuals. I notice that those who do that often like to spew broad statements with no back up and expect everyone to love them for it. No, we don’t. Hitler’s fans started this way. I don’t know why you make fun of the intelligentsia – I don’t know why anyone would. We want elite everything – diver, pilots, but you want a no nothing like Sarah – why? You think elite should only be associated with sharp shooters, but not the President? Well, you got your common sense, gee whiz, you betcha folksy moron with Bush. Now you want another?

  • W. Stokes

    My dear, you’re very wrong. Granted, there were groups of folks in college back in the 60s that got caught up in marching, wearing surplus army fatigues and smoking dope, but that doesn’t mean that ALL boomers were a part of it. Where do you suppose folks like you came from – underneath a cabbage leaf? The problem is that many from the ideological 60s grew up and finally realized that (1) they couldn’t get a job with all that hair (2) the weird clothes, which seemed cool when they were ‘searching for themselves,’ really weren’t conducive to being taken seriously by civilized society (3) communes really weren’t ‘where it’s at’ (4) there were some obvious advantages to soap, water and hygiene – among other things they apparently missed due to all the marching and protesting. But the vast majority never really participated anyhow.

    What most of those folks managed to do is produce offspring who have never lacked or wanted for anything. That is, before the offspring wanted, needed or requested things, those boomers provided them with ‘things’ – clothes, music, money, cell phones, ipods, computer games, cars – or any number of other ‘things.’ Those boomers created a generation of young folks that demand instant gratification. No, you say? How many go to college in a new car? Of course, all that was provided under the same guise the previous generation used – a desire for their children to have better than they did.

    Truth is, the boomers didn’t have it nearly as hard as their parents. We didn’t necessarily have home air conditioning and certainly didn’t have a cell phone in every pocket. And 45 RPM records were fine until the 33.3 long-play albums came out. Certainly the boomers had it much less difficult than their grand parents, who survived the depression and had no reservations about relating those hardships to boomers, whether they wanted to hear or not. But, somewhere along the line that mental and physical toughness was lost. So much so that today many of the hardships and difficulties are self-induced or are brought about through self pity, lack of initive and/or ignorance.

    Unfortunately, the boomers are guilty. They missed a significant point entirely. Their failure was not understanding that things one doesn’t have to work for in order to achieve, are not appreciated. By providing all things to a group of youngsters who have no idea of what they want makes nor more sense than the hippies did back in the 60s. Live experiences are very limited at age 25, yet some of the most profound political proclamations come from Hollywood-types in that age bracket that have been raised in a bubble.

    Somewhere along the line, these offspring, many of whom are college students, became blind to reality. Most have worked little, if any, to attain the status they have. Perhaps they feel ‘guilty’ for their status and the aspect of voting for a black candidate provides them with some sort of absolution. Whatever the reason, it seems that when they hear the glorious words of Obama, they seem attracted, much as the children of the village were attracted by the Pied Piper. Their frame of reference is narrow as there life experiences spans only a short time and they are easily lead, as were the hippies of the 60s, back in the day.

    Alas, ‘tis not your elders who lead you to the path of destruction – ‘tis their off spring and their grand children. It wasn’t the boomers who refused to have the stature of Pappy Boyington erected at the University of Washington, but young, dare I say liberal, college Students – perhaps lead by some radical faculty – who claimed such a monument would glorify war. Of course, if it hadn’t been for ol’ grouches like Pappy – willing to fight and die for their country – there likely wouldn’t be a University of Washington . . . or a San Francisco – at least not like we know them to be today . . . even less likely they’d be speaking English.

  • ElectionObserver

    Well-written post, Dr. Melissa. Relevantly, as numerous experts have pointed out, Obama (and Palin) are members of Generation Jones–born 1954 to 1965, between the Boomers and Xers.

    Here’s a new 5 minute video which speaks exactly to this topic, with a ton of top national TV pundits (e.g. Clarence Page, David Brooks, Karen Tumulty, Howard Wolfson, Michael Barone, Dick Morris, etc.) discussing the fact that Obama is a Joneser, and the surprisingly large role of GenJones in this election:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ta_Du5K0jk

  • JIM
  • Naqamel

    A reason for hope? Generation X has more in common with our Grandparents (the WW2 Generation) than we do with our parents (the Boomers).

    Palin 2012

  • Headless Unicorn Guy

    The fact is, the hippies want to drive the multi-culti, equal rights, liberal car while they’re still young enough to enjoy it. Barak Obama is just one more hippie-to-yuppie acquisition. It’s all about them.

    As we have in the California State Legislature here and now. Dominated by ex-hippies who are suddenly realizing they’re growing old and Have To Reshape The Entire World NOW!

    (Problem is, when you’re 50-60 and State Senator or Assemblyman For Life due to carefully-drawn one-party districts, you’re not Raging Against The Establishment, you ARE The Establishment. Thinning grey ponytail/Viagra prescription or no.)

    Relevantly, as numerous experts have pointed out, Obama (and Palin) are members of Generation Jones–born 1954 to 1965, between the Boomers and Xers. — ElectionObserver

    As someone born in 1955, I can tell you that “Generation Jones” is better described as a transition between Boomers and Xers, blending traits of both — the Ideological Idealism of the Boomers and the pessimism and cynicism of the Xers. (Yes, I know it’s a contrast; these two are always in conflict inside my psyche.) Strauss & Howe (the analysts of generation cycles I’m most familiar with) peg them as “late-cycle Boomers” and acknowledge a difference between them and the “First-cusp Boomers”. However, both have the trait of an Idealist generation: Ideological Purity and True Belief in the One True Way.

    A reason for hope? Generation X has more in common with our Grandparents (the WW2 Generation) than we do with our parents (the Boomers). — Naqamel

    Actually, according to the Strauss/Howe analysis, Gen X has more in common with the Lost Generation between the world wars; they peg the “Millenials” (Gen Y) as the closest match in time/attitude/Zeitgeist to the team/group-oriented WW2 “Greatest Generation”.

    Somewhat ominously, Strauss & Howe claim the generational configuration we have now tends to drift into an earthshaking survival situation on the level of WW2. They refer to it as “The Crisis of 2020″, as 2020 would be the time when the generations age into a similar pattern as during WW2, the strongest arrangement to weather a crisis and come out stronger and better. The worst arrangement? The arrangement that exists 20 years before the optimum, with the Idealist generation (Baby Boomers) dominant. The last time something blew up with that configuration was the American Civil War.

    Palin 2012 — Naqamel

    Only to discover that by 2012, the laws and Supreme Court decisions have changed the rules so (in the words of one Dem activist quoted in a LiveJournal flamewar) “No Republican Will Ever Be Able To Be Elected, Ever Again!”

  • Naqamel

    Only to discover that by 2012, the laws and Supreme Court decisions have changed the rules so (in the words of one Dem activist quoted in a LiveJournal flamewar) “No Republican Will Ever Be Able To Be Elected, Ever Again!”

    There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty, in this order:

    Soap Box
    Ballot Box
    Jury Box
    Ammo Box

    If the liberals get their way, the Soap Box will be removed by the “Fairness Doctrine”.

    The Ballot Box is already being removed by ACORN and massive democrat vote fraud.

    The Jury Box will be removed if Obama stacks the Supreme Court with barking moonbat liberals.

    Sadly, I am deeply concerned that the country is indeed headed for a civil war. Your prognosis may indeed be correct.

  • Mat

    Wow Melissa,

    It looks like you stirred up a hornets’ nest talking about the boomers! It’s either “you weren’t there, so what do you know” or “it wasn’t us, it’s our kids!” blame game (I’m a Gen-Xer myself). Been there, seen that. Truth is that history will probably show the Boomers as the beginning of the end for this country. Deep down, I think the boomers realize this, which is why they’re trying so hard to pull the “legacy” crap that Bill Clinton was so fond of. When you look at the millenial generation, you see people that the boomers want to live vicariously through. I personally love watching boomers go ape when someone talks about them in a bad way, so Bravo post!

  • Pingback: Wednesday Wanderings | GoodBoys Nation