Conservative Elites: Stop Whining–UPDATED

October 18, 2008 / 11:44 am • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

Okay, so let me see if I get this straight: Mark Steyn is an Outside the Beltway…what? If he doesn’t have an elite mind, who does? If he’s not an intellectual, who is? When Steyn defends Palin and Joe the Plumber, he’s defending her (and them) because he’s for the “vulgar“.

To my way of thinking, someone like Steyn, if one is willing to concede that he’s an intellectual, stands as evidence against the thesis of guys like Ross Douthot who says this:

Here’s the thing: The Republican Party will be a populist party going forward, or it won’t be a party at all. But the more populist it becomes – the more figures like Palin and Mike Huckabee and Tim Pawlenty replace the blue-blazer Republicans of yore – the more it needs an elite capable of preventing it from spinning away into anti-intellectualism, hidebound dogmatism, and pure folly. Yes, sometimes these elites are snobbish and insidery, overly impressed with credentials, overly concerned about what their liberal pals think, overly willing to treat their party’s base as an embarrassment. Sometimes the base is right and the elites are wrong. Sometimes you need a better class of elite entirely. But you still need them, and you need candidates who listen to them.

First, I disagree with Douthot’s supposition about the Republican Party must be a populist party to succeed. The notion that Mike Huckabee will be the face of the Republican party in the future is repugnant to me. He is a decent guy and the Republican tent is better for his voice in it, but please help us all. Huckabee is a conservative Jimmy Carter–long on folksy talk and big on big government solutions that just happen to fit his own brand of dogma. He’s no different than Al Gore–a guy defined by a rigid set of morality he’d like to use the government to impose on the rest of us. Um, no. That is not the direction the Republican party is going; nor should it be going that way.

Second, the notion that elites don’t support and promote populist ideology is laughable. That’s the thing about intellectuals: A leader can find just about any sort of theorist to support his point-of-view. He can also find ten who disagree with him, if his administration has the latitude for disagreement. Ultimately, though, the President has to make a decision and live with it. Very much like a surgeon has to live with his cuts. At a certain point, the incessant blabbing has to stop and someone has to make a diagnosis and treat and live with the consequences.

Patrick Ruffini’s point was that bickering doesn’t help at this stage in the game. And, he’s right. Let’s settle this dispute after the election, shall we? But no. From this Texas voter’s perspective, it seems like the Beltway folks are hedging because they don’t want to defend an abrasive, gruff, off-the-cuff guy like McCain for four years. They’d rather listen to the melodic Marxist language–so much so, that they’ll vote for him rather than suffer. They’d rather suffer the fools–criticism from the vulgar is so much easier to take than criticism from their Beltway buddies because they’re smarter after all.

Let’s face it: Pounding on Palin is easy. Oh my! It’s like T-ball for intellectuals. When she was first announced, the response from the intellectual class was so predictably unintellectual that I did a pre-emptive post focusing on Palin’s policy nudity. And by exposing their fangs, the Beltway insiders exposed what many Americans, not just conservatives or the euphamistic “populists”, suspected: Hollywood, DC and New York Media is controlled by a group of insiders who believe they know more than you or me.

When I attended the American’s For Prosperity/Samsphere Conference in Austin a while back, DC conservatives expressed shock and relief to be in a place so optimistically and unabashedly and progressively conservative-libertarian. More than one DC-ite said,”It’s like I’m the only conservative.” They were talking about Washington, DC, mind you, where a Republican is in the White House and where Congress has been in Republican control until the last two years.

So inside the Beltway types admit indirectly what outside the Beltway people suspect: That Washington, DC is run by people who believe IN Washington, DC. Government is the answer whether you are John McCain or Mike Huckabee or Hillary Clinton or, most of all, Barack Obama. It is just a matter of degree. No one believes Joe The Plumber is the answer. No one trusts Joe The Plumber. No one trusts Joe The Plumber except that he needs to pay his taxes to fund their pet projects. Joe needs to learn his place and be patriotic and do his civic duty–which is to pay to keep the Beltway folks in power.

And the elites wonder why American’s are angry? They wonder at an 8% approval rating? Are they want to dismiss the legitimate criticism of our public institutions as anti-intellectualism?

No, it’s as simple as survival. The DC folks, right and left, see someone like Sarah Palin–smart, a communicator, the embodiment of the equal rights work of this last generation, funny and direct–and they panic. It’s their own survival that’s at stake. Bush the first, through Clinton and now with George W.’s compassionate conservatism, have all believed that “good” government is the answer. Sure GW has been hard to take rhetorically, but he’s tried to be what the Insiders liked. Tried and failed. McCain has been even more eager to please. A fat lot it has done him.

Sarah Palin only wants to please citizens. That’s threatening. And it’s only populist in the sense that she actually seems to give a damn what voters think. I know, a novel concept. And what the people want, it seems, is less government the way it’s been done. They want less debt. They want some rationality. They get who gets bailed out and it isn’t the person who has been playing by the rules and funding these joker’s pet theories.

So enough with the impugning of Americans by the ruling American class. It’s bad enough to receive scorn from ostensibly sophisticated European socialists who couldn’t defend their borders if their lives depended on it. Beltway conservatives need to stiffen their collective spine and have some fortitude. Get out more. Visit the hinterlands and be refreshed. And then go back and fight for what is right and defend the ideals Americans still stand for.

And stop whining. Leave that to the Democrats.

UPDATED:

Maybe the Befuddled Beltway “conservative” insiders could take a lesson from courageous Hollywood insiders. Bet you never thought you’d read that!

  • http://sixmeatbuffet.com Preston Taylor Holmes

    Damn, preach it, sister! If Suckabee is our savior, then we’re not worth saving. And we’ve had enough of elitist, country-club republicans driving the GOP into disrepair. Palin and those like her are the last chance for this party before it is officially closed for business.

  • http://www.rightviewfromtheleftcoast.blogspot.com Mark J. Goluskin

    Hmm, I will take Preston’s comment a little differently. If The One loses and the Democrats do not make these big congressional gains, THEY should be the ones out of business! And, Patrick Rufini is spot on. We can have this debate-after the election and win or lose!

  • http://www.rpgohmy.blogspot.com John F Not Kerry

    As elitist as the Founders could be considered, their view of public service seemed to be one of duty, not privilege. If I see them rightly, they wanted citizen-legislators who would serve for a time in the House or the Senate, then go home and let someone else take their place. The entrenched politicains from both parties would be a foreign idea to them, as would how far the federal government has overreached it’s prescribed role in the Constitution.

  • Don L

    What is needed is term limits for the beltway class. George Will is the prototype for the sillyness that passes for conservative punditry.

    They all belong together -they think alike -they hobnob with each other, and practice deadly self-censorship thorough fear of being scorned by their comrades with laptops for weapons.

  • http://www.allthatisnecessary.com jjmurphy

    One benefit(?) of this election cycle is that it is “outing” of all these cocktail-circuit conservatives who are so desperate to maintain their iinvitations under an Obama presidency.

    Time for new blood. Time for people who actually believe in freedom, liberty and all that “quaint” stuff our founding fathers passed on to us.

  • Bilwick

    For some of these people it may be a careerist movie. They can benefit what I call “the Garry Wills Effect.” Wills was an obscure toiler in the NATIONAL REVIEW vineyards until he began criticizing Republicans. At that point he began appearing in bigger, higher-circulation magazines, his books got widely and respectfully reviewed, and his opinion sought out by the MSM. I’m not saying Wills altered his opinions as a career move; it just worked out that way. Since then others may have noticed the Wills Effect and acted accordingly.

    Many of these people strike me as what used to be called “responsible” conservatives. These were the “house” conservatives, who “knew their place,” always spoke politely to Massa Lib’ral, and would never ever threaten the Plantation. I used to call them “Uncle Clints,” after Clinton Rossiter, but that reference needs to be updated. I say we call them “Uncle Daves,” after David Brooks.

  • Bilwick

    I’d also like to add that for some of them this may be pure self-defense. Obamanation has not shown itself tolerant of dissenting views, and some of these “apostates” may simply be worried what’s going to happen when the Annoited One gets control of the Mailed Fist. These new “friends of Obama” may just be saying, Kent Brockman style, “I for one wish to welcome the coming Thugocracy.”

  • baserunr

    As the elites look down their noses at Sarah Palin from their Ivory Towers, they tut-tut John McCain for his error in executive judgment in selecting her. Hey blue-bloods, get a clue: You can’t govern as President if you don’t get elected, and to McCain’s credit he realized that he can’t get elected without an energized base. His executive judgment is completely validated by selecting Palin, who indeed has energized the base, because she is more like them than you are. It’s not populisim she’s selling, it’s common sense. I don’t know how things run in DC, but I know how they ought to run. So does Palin.

  • J David

    What about the whining of the non-”elites” on behalf of Ms. Palin, who is being at least partially, and correctly, judged by some of us for the company she has chosen to keep…namely the Soros-owned, Juan Amnesty McVain.

    Hitching her political star to the “Straight Talk” Titanic was not forced upon her, and no amount Palin-propping changes who the presidential candidate happens to be…

  • Bilwick

    So, bottom-line it for me, J. David, which team (McCain & Palin, or the Red-Diaper Baby & State-shtupping Joe) is, on the whole, better for freedom? Because for those of us in the pro-freedom camp, that’s really the only thing that matters.

  • http://home.earthlink/net/~doctorfixit/reforms/ Rick LaBonte

    I don’t know how much more evidence we need that our political class is not interested in what Americans really want: less government, lower taxes, border control, less liberalism, political correctness, waste, and corruption. The Republican party is not the vehicle to get us where we want to go. The sooner the Republican party is replaced with a real conservative party, the better. Being “Democrat-light”, “reaching across the aisle”, being “bi-partisan”, being “moderate”, are all the strategies for losers. McCain is a perfect example. If we are not to excoriate him now for being such a wimp, suck-up, collaborator, sellout, betrayer, then when? After he loses? The Republican party has allowed itself to be branded as racist, anti-social, fascist, stupid, imperialist, and on and on. The name “Republican” is forever fixed in the public mind. Bravo, Democrats, your propaganda has worked. So, change if nothing else, change your name, for crying out loud, at least until you can figure out what you want to be: populist, conservative, libertarian, whatever. After the Bushes, the McCains, the Schwarzeneggers, the Bloombergs, and now Colin Powell, I haven’t the slightest idea what “Republian” means, except that it isn’t doing me any good.

  • Pingback: This

  • Mr. Chuckles

    Rick,

    The republican party allowed itself to be branded as such when it elected Bush as it’s star. Early on Bush used vile tactics (McCain illegitimate baby trash talk for example) to swing the primaries in his direction, and your party ate it up like candy. You reap what you sow. Half of the country knew he was a nimrod but you all carried him forth as if he was the second coming. I will agree with you that the party has lost it’s conservative soul. Neocons are gov’t spenders with no equal – they just pissed it away on different crap than their dem counterparts. I could have gotten behind McCain if he had pushed for budget reforms harder, but when he pledged another 100 years in Iraq he lost me. Yes, it really is about the economy, stupid, and everything else falls in line when America is humming along financially (not artificially with inflated home prices and ATM home loans). I’m also tired of government (both left and right) deciding social issues. They have absolutely no business regulating for social change. States need to reclaim their power from the fed on issues such as abortion, gun control, etc. The strength of this country used to be an acceptance of the opposing point of view and a lack of desire to interfere. I fear we will soon have public unrest like 1970′s Ireland because of the intolerance on both sides. Leave me the f**k alone and I will do the same. All the fed should be doing is keeping us safe from harm and making sure the economy keeps cruising.