What He Said

October 25, 2008 / 2:46 pm • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

Charles Krauthammer keeps his eye on the ball in his ringing endorsement of John McCain. Please read the whole thing. Here is an excerpt:

I stand athwart the rush of conservative ship-jumpers of every stripe — neo (Ken Adelman), moderate (Colin Powell), genetic/ironic (Christopher Buckley) and socialist/atheist (Christopher Hitchens) — yelling “Stop!” I shall have no part of this motley crew. I will go down with the McCain ship. I’d rather lose an election than lose my bearings.
*****
McCain’s critics are offended that he raised the issue of William Ayers. What’s astonishing is that Obama was himself not offended by William Ayers.

Moreover, the most remarkable of all tactical choices of this election season is the attack that never was. Out of extreme (and unnecessary) conscientiousness, McCain refused to raise the legitimate issue of Obama’s most egregious association — with the race-baiting Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Dirty campaigning, indeed.

The case for McCain is straightforward. The financial crisis has made us forget, or just blindly deny, how dangerous the world out there is. We have a generations-long struggle with Islamic jihadism. An apocalyptic soon-to-be-nuclear Iran. A nuclear-armed Pakistan in danger of fragmentation. A rising Russia pushing the limits of revanchism. Plus the sure-to-come Falklands-like surprise popping out of nowhere.

Who do you want answering that phone at 3 a.m.? A man who’s been cramming on these issues for the past year, who’s never had to make an executive decision affecting so much as a city, let alone the world? A foreign policy novice instinctively inclined to the flabbiest, most vaporous multilateralism (e.g., the Berlin Wall came down because of “a world that stands as one”), and who refers to the most deliberate act of war since Pearl Harbor as “the tragedy of 9/11,” a term more appropriate for a bus accident?

Or do you want a man who is the most prepared, most knowledgeable, most serious foreign policy thinker in the United States Senate? A man who not only has the best instincts but has the honor and the courage to, yes, put country first, as when he carried the lonely fight for the surge that turned Iraq from catastrophic defeat into achievable strategic victory?

I don’t believe in political saviors. There is no perfect candidate. There is no perfect president. No politician of any stripe can have all the answers in this complex and difficult world. Every election, voters must make the best choice between two fallible human beings. This election is no different however much the Obama supporters seem to believe otherwise.

What a person must look to in a president, ultimately, is his principles, beliefs, experience, and integrity. People expecting perfection are bound to be disappointed.

  • Frank McLaughlin

    The chief problem with Charles’ comments is that McCain has not had good instincts. He called for invading Iraq before the Bush White House. He has had no instincts on the financial crises, no wisdom to offer, lurching this way and that as the crises unfolded. One senses that he has no grasp of credit-swap derivaties or how the government might regulate them. His choice for Vice-President according to many conservative pundits–Peggy Noone, George Will, Chris Buckley to name a few–has demonstrated a reckless, impulsive side. Worse, we now know he didn’t vet her properly.

    He gets some credit for the surge, but you want a president for that one call? According to a Pentagon study release last July, the surge is not the main reason for the reduction in violence there, but only incidental.

    In McCain you’ve got a guy who seems awkward and uncomfortable, sometimes in the company of his own vice-pres nominee. A guy who frequently misspeaks on key facts, and a guy who has flip-flopped on a half a dozen key issues such as immigation and Bush’s tax cuts.

  • Nat Wiesel

    My main objections to John McCain are

    1) that he supports a tax cut for the wealthiest 1% that amounts to an enormous windfall. They already pay a lower tax rate than I do and I work for a living.

    2) the large number of negative attacks and ads that have been proven to be inaccurate, out of context or just plain false.

    3) I am concerned that he will carry on the policies of G. W. Bush, whom I loathe. This war has cost us over 4,000 lives and nearly a trillion dollars.

    That said, I will probably hold my nose and vote for him anyway.

  • http://irzzbjf.com/btlikgj.html Tia Buckner

    hi
    u4wdr0a9lokkts1s
    good luck