<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time To Have The Money Talk: Bad News, There Is None</title>
	<atom:link href="http://melissablogs.com/2008/11/08/time-to-have-the-money-talk-bad-news-there-is-none/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://melissablogs.com/2008/11/08/time-to-have-the-money-talk-bad-news-there-is-none/</link>
	<description>Information Pollination</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Arvanitis</title>
		<link>http://melissablogs.com/2008/11/08/time-to-have-the-money-talk-bad-news-there-is-none/comment-page-1/#comment-10669</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Arvanitis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 00:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melissaclouthier.com/?p=11322#comment-10669</guid>
		<description>Dr. C:

As a sincere person, you may be taking the NY Times article at face value - serious advice on intergenerational wealth issues in difficult markets.

The NY Times is not in the least interested in the purported issue.  The liberal media is merely setting out claims that Obama is &quot;inheriting&quot; a bad economy.  That way, he can try to claim credit for the expected and natural turn-around of capitalism.  OR...when his redistributionist policies quash recovery, he can plead exigent circumstances.

To recap, with the old media, it&#039;s always abotu credit and blame, never about reality.

******

Capitalism is inherently cyclical. The bottom of the capitalist cycle beats the best of the socialist times.  Ask yourself: in 1933, would you rather be an unemployed factory worker in America, or a starving peasant in Ukraine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. C:</p>
<p>As a sincere person, you may be taking the NY Times article at face value &#8211; serious advice on intergenerational wealth issues in difficult markets.</p>
<p>The NY Times is not in the least interested in the purported issue.  The liberal media is merely setting out claims that Obama is &#8220;inheriting&#8221; a bad economy.  That way, he can try to claim credit for the expected and natural turn-around of capitalism.  OR&#8230;when his redistributionist policies quash recovery, he can plead exigent circumstances.</p>
<p>To recap, with the old media, it&#8217;s always abotu credit and blame, never about reality.</p>
<p>******</p>
<p>Capitalism is inherently cyclical. The bottom of the capitalist cycle beats the best of the socialist times.  Ask yourself: in 1933, would you rather be an unemployed factory worker in America, or a starving peasant in Ukraine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

