“Little Marxists”

December 15, 2008 / 2:47 pm • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

Dr. Helen answers a question from a librarian/teacher about goose-stepping 4th graders and how to help kids get properly educated about such things as capitalism versus socialism.

In our kids’ school, the Third Grade project is starting a business, paying more rent for better space (the front classrooms), choosing partners, a product to sell, marketing it, etc. Well guess what? There’s much gnashing of teeth when a kid picks a slouch for a partner. There’s agony (even though the teachers try to spin it positively as our “civic duty”) when the teacher comes and collects the taxes from hard earned bucks. It’s a nice learning experience all the way around.

What would be an even better solution in my opinion is to create a socialist week, in all it’s mediocre glory. So everyone works as a group, makes a crappy product that no one wants to buy, two kids do all the work, but all the kids get the same pay and the government takes 80% of their income. Then, a kid decides he’s hurt his toe and can’t work but gets the same pay. If they work harder they only get a C.

If kids got to experience both capitalism and socialism, they’d make the right choice because socialism is inherently unfair, rewards failure, and is a disincentive to achievement and production. Kids are hardwired for fairness. They get it.

While I know education is important, I think how a kid is raised is even more important. A dull-witted parent emphasizing self-esteem over honest achievement will destroy the best school lessons. And a parent who emphasizes hard work and morality will inoculate against soft-headed ideas rooted in post-modern and Marxist philosophies.

Team sports help because there’s winners and losers. Individual sports help because there is only achievement. Getting a job during High School helps a kid manage his energy and money.

Marxism has to be taught and indoctrinated because it goes against natural law. It is antithetical to how men are wired and ignores basic psychology. Marxism sounds great on paper and stinks in real life. It feels good to believe in collective everything, but it falls flat in practice. That’s why any training about these philosophies needs to be taken out of the realm of theory and into real life.

Get a kid on a ball field or court and he’ll learn the concepts of talent, hard work and winners and losers pretty quickly. Let him makes some money and then have the government take half to spend how they see fit, and he’ll understand why excessive taxation is a disincentive.

Real life cures Marxists.

Cross-posted at RightWingNews and the Houston Chronicle

  • William

    The only real problem I see, Dr. Clouthier, is that the sports leagues for little kids don’t promote winners and losers any more. They promote participation. Everyone gets a trophy. How lame is that? If you can’t play worth a darn, why should you get a trophy? I don’t think so. When I turned 16, I was of course jonesin’ for my driver’s license. I took it and passed, but my parents made me get a job and pay for my own insurance. I also had the rule that I could drive my dad’s truck (which was an awesome jacked up 4×4) so long as I returned it with the same amount of gas as I got it. Or worst case, leave money on the table so he could fill it up to where it was. I had to do that a few times. But, it taught how to budget money, that’s for sure. Everything is handed to kids today and thus they expect it to be that way in the workplace. We have a co-op that is 22 and she thinks she deserves everything. We just want to smack her upside the head.

  • Matt K.

    Dr., are you suggesting we’re hard wired for capitalism?

  • http://melissaclouthier.com Dr. Melissa Clouthier

    Matt K.,

    Yes.

  • Trish

    LIFE is hard-wired for capitalism.

  • Matt K.

    Dr.,

    How do you explain the substantial number of people, be they right or wrong, who advocate other economic systems?

    How do you explain that capitalism is a relatively recent development (both as an idea and in practice) in human existence?

    If we’re hard wired for capitalism, wouldn’t we all agree to be capitalists?

    And if you believe it is possible to brainwash someone into believing in an economic system that is contrary to their nature, then isn’t it possible that it is you who is brainwashed?

  • http://melissaclouthier.com Dr. Melissa Clouthier

    Before there were philosophers philosophizing, there were merchants selling and trading and buying. Remember the Silk Road? The impulse to work, make a product, sell it and build a business is as old as time.

  • Chalmers

    Am I a man dreaming that I am a butterfly, or am I a butterfly dreaming that I am a man?

    Matt K, it sounds really philosophic and cool on campus, but in real life, not so much.

    The “other” economic systems you reference are? Capitalism is as old as time. You have something I want, I pay for it. You make it better than anyone else, I will pay a premium. You reduce your cost (see: improved trade routes), you make more money.

    The American variant of Capitalism is obviously young, since America is young. Capitalism as a construct has been around much longer.

  • Jeremy

    Dr. Clouthier,
    I just wanted to make apoint on your comment:

    “Before there were philosophers philosophizing, there were merchants selling and trading and buying. Remember the Silk Road? The impulse to work, make a product, sell it and build a business is as old as time.”

    While your right on that point, you can’t really call a mercantile economy capitalism, since merchants didn’t own the means of production. Hunters and gatherers also traded with city artisans, but we wouldn’t call their economic activity capitalist, since goods were produced and traded under very different conditions. It’s correct to say that markets (as a place of exchange) are very old, but your conflation of markets of the past to the capitalist market of today is intellectually lazy.

  • http://www.chl-tx.com TX CHL Instructor

    “Marxism has to be taught and indoctrinated because it goes against natural law.”

    Not really. Very little teaching is needed to convince somebody that he can get something for nothing (or by somebody else’s effort), because everyone already wants to believe that.

  • http://melissaclouthier.com Dr. Melissa Clouthier

    Actually, TX CHL, you make a great point. Going by the 80-20 rule, 80% will be happy with the 20% doing the work.

  • Matt K.

    Wow, I can’t believe how low the level of discourse is on this site in general and on this thread in particular.

    Rather than have a discussion based on logic or evidence, most of you would rather discount my point of view for the simple reason that I’ve had more education than most.

    That being the case, I’m moving on to greener pastures. You folks can continue to promote your narrow point of view and continue getting your asses handed to you in elections.

    And keep telling yourselves that I’m the crazy one; it’s people like me who just elected your president.

    God bless,

    Matt K.

  • Chalmers

    Matt K,

    Let me be the first to say thank you and farewell.

  • WayneB

    And keep telling yourselves that I’m the crazy one; it’s people like me who just elected your president.

    But that’s what scares the sh** out of us.

    People who, “advocate other economic systems,” either believe in an unrealistic view of mankind (people will work at whatever is needed without any significant incentive to do so), are lazy and want others to do the work for them, or are ambitious, but want to take advantage of the other two by promising them that they are right, and controlling them through controlling the means of implementing those “other economic systems”. Incidentally, the ones who have an unrealistic view of mankind often turn into mankind-haters when they find out that people are NOT inherently altruistic, and that they need both laws and incentives to keep them on the correct path, because many of them believe that such rules and incentives are wrong.

    That is, unless you’re not referring to Communism, Socialism, or similar systems. In which case, I’d really like to know what you ARE referring to.

  • http://www.codeplex.com/site/users/view/aciclovir fast delivery aciclovir

    Well 1.0 has an end of life date now. July rather than March as you had suggested.