Obama Palooza: How Long Will The Honeymoon Last?

January 19, 2009 / 12:24 pm • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

How long can the Obasm last? That’s the question before us and that’s the question that provoked spirited debate among some friends this weekend.

Friends argued that the honeymoon would be short because Obama wouldn’t be able to keep his promises, that the economy would stink, and that people are fickle. Voters turn quickly when things don’t go their way. They are self-interested and when a leader disappoints them, they turn on the leader. George Bush was used as an example. He had huge approval ratings after 9/11 but look how it turned out.

I argued that the Obama love would last four years. Why? Because his voters voted for him not for his ideas. He didn’t really articulate specific plans. He just gave vague promises. Voters were so enamored with the idea of him and he’ll be around for four years, so the love will continue. The Press and the voters, too, imbued Obama with so much wonderfulness that to turn on him is to turn on their own perfect judgment. Since the vote was essentially narcissistic and people don’t hate themselves, Obama will be loved for a good long time.

This is the difference between Democrat and Republican voters. The Republicans have expectations. George Bush’s approval ratings dipped so low because those in his own party disapproved of his policies. No such discontent will happen with Obama. If Obama changes his mind or governs in a way that surprises Lefties, they will assume he is doing what must be done for the noblest of reasons. Since he can’t be wrong, they won’t be disappointed. Well, that’s my theory anyway.

Who’s right?


The Obama honeymoon will last….
All four years
Until he screws up

  
pollcode.com free polls

  • J.D.

    I don’t know how long the “love” will last either, but I am pretty sure it will be a while. I agree that most voted for him on the basis of a positive emotional response to a vague, pleasant sounding, fanastatical notion of CHANGE (plus McCain was so defeatable from day one because he does not offer a significant difference in actual practice and behavior). Problem is that improvement was not mentioned in this so-called change. People don’t really want change, just like people don’t really want the truth when they say they do. We want to feel good about ourselves and our group think/judgement and be comfy and well liked by others. After several years of closed-minded blundering in the exec branch, Prince Hussein is a seeming breath of fresh air, but change… get real. Only thing that will change is a loss of more freedoms on top of the ones King George has already stomped out. Let the glorying in the idea of a savior continue on!

  • wdnorman54

    The “honeymoon” is already beginning to fade: appointees, lies about Gitmo, Lies about economy.

    The trouble wee will face is He’s a Democrat. Being a Democrat all is already forgiven (al la Bill). When you cannot get an approval rating any lower than 40-50% (give 40-50% of the respondents are completely clueless democrats themselves) who needs to worry about a “honeymoon”.

    Now, Congress WILL roll over,like they did for Bill, and give Obama anything his wildest imagination can come up with during the first 100days “because that is the honeymoon” and they can blame ANY depth of Stupidity on Obama.

    I remember a few members of Congress getting on TV and telling the whole world Bill didn’t ask for enough (left-leaning) programs. They would have given him more if he’d asked…

  • http://norunnyeggs.com steveegg

    Unless Obama goes “conservative”, the love affair between him and the presstitutes (who are his real cheerleaders) will go for as long as he’s in office.

  • Mr. Chuckles

    wdnorman-

    Congress rolled over for Clinton? Clinton lost congressional control after 1994. If there was any rolling, it was the repubs, not dems. He may have gotten his way for a brief period, but Gingrich and his cronies had at him for the remaining six. Go back and read your history.

    For all of you doomsday folks, understand that the same thing will happen to Obama if he shifts too far left. 2010 will be the litmus test for how the nation feels about him and his policies, and more importantly the policies of an admittedly moronic bunch in congress. Obama is (and this is unbelievable…)actually too centrist for many members in both houses, but especially in the house. I would probably like to see Reid and Pelosi (and Feinstein, and Boxer, et al) out of their respective offices more than any of you as they give dems an even worse name than they already have.

    Many of us who voted for Obama (and I did so as an independent) did so because he was the lesser of two evils; in this case one who was a status quo do nothing and one who at least has the potential to create more jobs. I’ll be the first to criticize “the one” (as you all put) it when he demonstrates incompetency. However, given the low bar that the previous administtration set, he will have to fall a LOOOONG way before that happens.

  • http://blog.thought-mesh.net Annoying Old Guy

    It will on for at least four years, because any and all backtracking, mistakes, and massive failures will be the result of President Bush’s toxic legacy. It is inconceivable for Obama to fail.

  • John Andrews

    I was just looking over the Jimmy Carter history and it matches much of what we see now in Barak Obama, except that Obama does not have a business background or a government management background (Governor). But, politically they are very similar. Because of this, I think that we will see a four year term similar to Carters presidency. And that makes me fearful…

  • http://www.rightklik.net/ jason

    “Voters were so enamored with the idea of him and he’ll be around for four years, so the love will continue.”

    I’m afraid your analysis is ABSOLUTELY correct. Obama worshipers will project any disappointment onto his conservative adversaries. There will be no accountability. This is a very dangerous dynamic.
    http://www.rightklik.net/

  • http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_pl212 Glynn W.

    Doctor,

    Forgive me, but wasn’t it a few short weeks ago where you declared Obama’s honeymoon “officially over”?

    I think the Righties need to take a deep breath. Before the “over” declaration you wrote about how “proud” you were to have cast your for George W. Bush. Twice.

    Obama is going to have a lot of work to do to rectify the results of your horrible mistake. Americans understand that, and that’s why they are willing to give him support as he attempts to fix this horrible mess your side has gotten us into.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_pl212

    The thing is, he is going to need a lot of help. Wouldn’t it be nice, for once, to get with the program and join the right side of history?

    We are in for some very rough years. Obama is going to need all the help he can get.

  • http://blahgwrite.blogspot.com/ Mat

    Yes Glynn,

    We should just get with the program and lockstep with the goose-stepping redshirts (I’d say brownshirts, but red is the socialist color). Didn’t Germany go through this phase a while back? Either agree with the Nazis, or else? Talk about history…

  • LEARNED FOREVER

    I can’t predict the irrational, squishy behavior of emotion-drenched, paranoid democrats. But this I noticed. Today, a huge section of Obamas speech was devoted to qoutes and paraphrases of the Founding Fathers. Praise to the generations of Americans that have sacrificed on the battlefield and off to keep this country free. He spoke of a new era of Personal Responsibility. Dedication to family and community. Volunteerism; serving others before self. Eliminating government programs that don’t work. And much more. (Harry and Nancy don’t talk of these things.)

    I haven’t heard a speech like this since Ronald Reagan. I haven’t heard a speech like this from a Democrat since Jack Kennedy. So I wonder:

    How long will it be before adoring democrats of all pesuasions, all colors, all sizes, come to the following Group Think Epiphany…”Weve elected — their cute word, not mine — AN OREO!”

  • http://www.srwolf.com/reports/Stiglitz10trillion.pdf Glynn W.

    Mat,

    I am not asking you to agree with anything. Your ignorance is your business.

    But this new President guy that the majority of Americans elected has a lot of work to do. The messes left by you Bushies are staggering in their enormity and scope.

    Perhaps, instead of the nonsense, we can all do our part to move our corner of the world forward – instead of tearing down our new President.

  • LEARNED FOREVER

    My short answer:

    Bill Clinton is pro-abortion. And our
    first black president. A hero to millions.

    Barack Obama is pro-abortion. And our
    second black president. Do the math.

  • MINa

    I did not vote for him therefore why would i now support him? I did not vote for him because of his political philosophy and leftist leanings so why would I now (Just because he has been sworn in) support him. I will not support him for the entire time he is in office which should only be four years. Congress will swing back to conservativism in two more as inflation grows and government does not solve any problems by nationalizing the banks and putting people on whiter coller welfare commonlly called government jobs. The bellweather will be the Black Community who are presently razing the white middle class Americans for being themselves. I saw this in the beginning of the great society and things continued to go down hill for Johnson as they will for Obama. When Welfare increases are slow to come and inflation eats them up immediately and there is no more money to hand out, the government will look to business to save the economy and have to gine huge concessions in order for it to pull us out of our crisis which by the way was brought about by living everyone living on credit.

  • Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg

    “…fix this horrible mess your side has gotten us into…”

    Which one is that? The first stable, Arab democracy in the history of the Middle East? The lack of domestic terror attacks since 9/11?