<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPI PolicyBytes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://melissablogs.com/2009/03/22/ipi-policybytes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://melissablogs.com/2009/03/22/ipi-policybytes/</link>
	<description>Information Pollination</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:04:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Hayden</title>
		<link>http://melissablogs.com/2009/03/22/ipi-policybytes/comment-page-1/#comment-14159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melissaclouthier.com/?p=13301#comment-14159</guid>
		<description>The ability to use net neutrality as a censorship device is so clear I don&#039;t understand why it&#039;s not a bigger part of the debate.

That aside, it&#039;s ludicrous on its face that all bits flying through the pipes should be treated equally; clearly there are emergency services that should get priority as needed, and no one wants spam to get equal treatment with actual information.

Plus: Why SHOULDN&#039;T I be able to pay for an internet service that prioritizes, say, online gaming performance over email and the like. If that&#039;s my interest, it&#039;s a perfectly legitimate service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ability to use net neutrality as a censorship device is so clear I don&#8217;t understand why it&#8217;s not a bigger part of the debate.</p>
<p>That aside, it&#8217;s ludicrous on its face that all bits flying through the pipes should be treated equally; clearly there are emergency services that should get priority as needed, and no one wants spam to get equal treatment with actual information.</p>
<p>Plus: Why SHOULDN&#8217;T I be able to pay for an internet service that prioritizes, say, online gaming performance over email and the like. If that&#8217;s my interest, it&#8217;s a perfectly legitimate service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

