Sarah Palin Does As She Damn Well Pleases–UPDATED

July 5, 2009 / 12:17 pm • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

Once again, everyone is angry about Sarah Palin’s choices. Well, time will tell if she’s making a brilliant choice or a Guiliani jump into oblivion. After the treatment she’s received at the hands of the insiders, pundits, strategists, media, fellow women and everyone else, I don’t give a shit what any of them thinks. She’ll be pilloried by everyone no matter what she decides, no matter why she decides it, so she might as well do what she wants.

This woman taps some deep-seated Freudian place that still confounds me as an observer. She’s beautiful. She’s smart. She’s a mother. She’s flawed. She’s sexy. She’s ambitious. She’s married. She’s a regular person. She’s an outsider. She’s a spoiler. She has, gasp!, long hair.

How many iconic images can one woman conjure? Well, that imagery links energetically to the common person’s hopes and fears. She brings out the clucking church ladies, yes, I’m talking about feminists, wanting to brand her with the scarlet letter for being powerful, sexual, female, beautiful and most of all, feminine. The fangs and claws are bared and it’s as transparent as the politics of a sixth grade dance. Make no mistake: If she were butch, we would not be having this discussion.

There are men who grate at the unfairness of an identity-politics choice like Sarah Palin. We’ll talk when money and name (Romney, McCain, Bush) cease to be part of the political process. Puhleeeze. It’s not like John Q. Public has an ice cube’s chance in Hade’s hottest room of becoming president. Sarah Palin at least became Governor on her own accomplishments. The three listed men all had a name built from their fathers and their father’s fathers. So enough with that argument. If her femaleness helps her, fine. Life, and politics, and war, ain’t fair. Deal.

For the press, you deserve shit. If Sarah Palin never does another interview with your unfair, biased asses, it’s no more than you deserve. She serves to bring you ratings and you indulge your mental masturbation by giving her questions that Barack Obama wouldn’t expect on Helen Thomas’ worst day. That you’re so blinded by your hate that you can’t see your bias just demonstrates how much you all wash in the same dirty pond.

And if you special interest groups: DC insiders, the Press, the feminists and the rest of the elites, don’t understand that the American citizenry is sick of your holier-than-thou attitude and disgusting derision for the common man, you have another thing coming. Sarah Palin’s success is a direct result of your consistent, unrelenting, condescending arrogance. Had one shred of fairness or responsiveness been demonstrated toward the American people, I don’t think Sarah Palin would be tapping into any of this sentiment.

But you guys are so insufferably pompous and predictable. Like Napolean’s court: dirty, back-stabbing, churlish, insiderish, insular and blind to the world around you.

I’m not a huge fan of populist revolutions, but hells bells, AMERICA was a populist revolution. We were never intended to be a RULED nation, yet that’s exactly what we’ve become. Harvard educated, czar appointing Barack Obama is no different. Everyone hoped he would bring hope and change. He was elected on that promise. As his policies destroy hope and the economy, people will resent the changes he wrought.

The time may just be right for a plucky, awkwardly speaking gal from Alaska. You betcha! Behold, your worst nightmare.

UPDATED:

Late to The Anchoress’ party. She has a thoughtful round-up and says:

It’s tough to govern and not go broke when the other side has decided to nibble you to death – and to build up a “record of questionable ethics” against you while they do so. The left and the press, who one might characterize as “at war” with Palin and her family, have tossed together a mess of Palin narratives (she’s “stupid,” they’re “trailer-trash,” the daughters are “sluts,” she looks like a “slutty flight attendant,” they are cornpone, she is inept, she “can see Russia from her window” and oh, yeah, she’s really her son’s grandmother, and one of her “slutty” daughters got pregnant just a few weeks after giving birth to that retarded kid that everyone wishes she [or her daughter, winkwink] had aborted) and they have created an enormous battle-hill out of all of that.

And I suspect Sarah Palin has looked around and decided, no – she is not going to die on that hate-constructed hill. I think she’s going to do her thing, forge her own path by her own lights, and eventually head back into politics on her own damn hill – and with (one fervently hopes) a hum-dinger of a speech-writer.

Amen on the speech-writer thing.

More from Patterico who asks, “Is it verboten to criticize Palin?” Evidently. The thing is, IF she’s going for higher office, people are going to have to ferret out fair-minded feedback from the slash and burn journalism.

I just do not get Icon worship–whether it be Sarah Palin, Michael Jackson, or Barack Obama. These are PEOPLE. Fallible, human, selfish, emotional, …..people. No man is God. Since the time of Israel, people have been looking for a human leader to fill that bill. Hello? Not going to happen.

  • http://www.mydismalswamp.wordpress.com Big Al

    Danged if I don’t agree with every word!

  • Jim

    Great article! I agree with your analysis and believe in a year or so people will be hungering for a individual like her.

  • Bash1955

    Rock on sister! Way to stick it to them. I enjoyed this so much that I will reread this several times over the next few days. Great work!!

  • Des

    She is stupid? I don’t mean to be rude, this is an assesment of her intellect, not an insult.

  • http://politics.upnorthmommy.com Kim Priestap

    You go, Melissa! I’m with you all the way. Sarah Palin is going to do as she pleases and when she pleases. Screw the elites who just cluck, cluck and tut, tut like a bunch of busybody old ladies with nothing better to do but to gossip about other people.

  • fuster

    No one except the people who supported her when she asked to be elected governor have a right to be disappointed.
    To those people, Palin owes an explanation.
    Palin’s detractors, and also her fans, are getting what they deserve.

  • Andrew

    “Perhaps the best part of Palin’s announcement [July 3]:

    Life is too short to compromise time and resources… it may be tempting and more comfortable to just keep your head down, plod along, and appease those who demand: “Sit down and shut up”, but that’s the worthless, easy path; that’s a quitter’s way out.

    Quitters stick to it. Winners quit.”

    –David Kurtz

  • Brad Schwartze

    Dr. Melissa, I’ve been thinking about this over the past two day (after first crying my eyes out at the news), and some things come to my mind.

    1. Per your comment about “money and name,” it’s fairly obvious to me that Sarah already has financial backers. NTTAWWT; an industrialist named Stewart Mott single-handedly provided initial seed money toward Sen. “Clean Gene” McCarthy’s 1968 presidential run. Reagan had initial big-money folks help him with his CA Governor’s races.

    2. Those financial backers, along with Sarah herself, are making one of the biggest political bets in US History. I don’t care what your thoughts are about Sarah, and Republicans in general; You have to respect that sort of risk-taking.

    3. A lot of conservative bloggers, and National Review, better start thinking of what draws an audience for them in the first place. We’re going to be living with the making of Sarah Palin v2.0, and certain folks aren’t going to take too kindly to past wishy-washiness.

    Other than that, enjoy the history and the experience that is before us. If you can, be a part of it. Your kids and grandkids will be impressed later.

  • Ruth H

    You are so right. I’ve never thought of myself as a populist but Sarah Palin is my leader. I am old enough to be her mother and I take great pride in her, in her education, her drive, her mothering skills, and her knowledge of what America is all about. Not just the east coast and the west coast and the DC area, ALL of it. She speaks to us, she says what we think. She is not implying what we want to hear. I do not agree with her in every respect but I respect everything she says, because she believes what she says. Thank God she is real but that is why they hate her. She has conquered their news cycles and must be defeated by the MSM.

  • fuster

    No, Brad, you don’t have to respect this type of risk-taking.
    What you have to respect is someone who, after asking for and getting a job, goes out and does the job rather than quitting.

    There’s nothing to respect about that.

    If you want to cry because Palin let you down , that’s fine.

  • jasperjava

    I read a lot of conservative bloggers who insist that Sarah Palin is “smart” or “intelligent”. I wonder what evidence they use to back up these assertions.

    Just this Friday, with her rambling, incoherent resignation speech, and her politically self-destructive actions, she does not inspire confidence in her intellect. I wonder why conservative commentators are so desperate to ascribe a quality to Sarah Palin that clearly isn’t there.

  • http://none Loren A. Jacobs

    Dr. Melissa glad to see you get your dander up. I agree with all you wrote and then some. Unfortunately you left out the rightwing nuts who also have tried to undercut this fine lady. I really think the Repubs have more to fear at this juncture than the Dems. Espceially if, as some pundits are predicting, she wants the extra time to build a new party (TEA anyone?)

    For those of you, who like jasperjava, question her brain power – are you attempting to compare her to the Harvard educated telepromter – the One who cannot speak without? Or the past, Harvard educated president who quite frequently inserted foot in mouth? Sarah, bless her, has an education that a whole bunch of us “common folk” have. Attending more than one college plus the school of Hard Knocks.

    As for Quitter? I don’t think so. Maybe a MacArthurism: “We are not retreating, just attacking from a different direction!” (Possibly the wrong General; but, appropriate non-the-less).

    As I mentioned in yesterday’s comments: Sit back and enjoy the show. “Class” will tell.

    Papasnake

  • fuster

    Jacobs, unless she explains why she isn’t obligated to finish out the term of office that she asked the people of Alaska to elect her to, why isn’t “qutitter” entirely appropriate?

  • http://none Loren A. Jacobs

    Fester, I suggest that you read her statement at
    http://sarahpalinblog.typepad.com/

    It would seem, at least to me, that Gov. Palin has accomplish most of what she was elected to do, has a capable replacement in the Lt. Governor and is tired of seeing the Alaskan monies being used to defend herself and the state from unwarranted and fradulent attacks by the peoples who wish her ill – some fifteen to date.

    Papasnake

  • http://shakeypete.blogspot.com Peter

    In case all the smart people can’t understand how a half million dollar debt can make a middle class family get real tired of public service, let me repeat. This middle class family is a half million dollars in debt for defending themselves from groundless claims. With no end in sight.

    The State of Alaska spent a couple million dollars investigating these groundless claims. Most state require some little thing called “evidence” to start this process. Alaska does not, and won’t, until a few Democrats get that same treatment.

    The Dems up in Alaska have a nice racket going. There is no downside for them to make groundless ethics charges against the Governor that got a few members of her own Party locked up for being crooks. The Governor then goes broke while the Dems titter and then say, oh, look, there are ethics questions!

  • fuster

    Lurid Jacobs, I listened to her statement and read your link.

    When she asked to be elected, it wasn’t for a term of her own choosing. It wasn’t for until she felt like she was good to go. It wasn’t until people started annoying her.

    If she feels the need to quit, that’s her right as a person. Nothing can make her fulfill the commitment that she asked to undertake and nothing she said or you might think changes the nature of what she’s doing in walking away from the people who elected her.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtUAHPYYzeM Glynn W.

    Unfair. Everyone is not angry at all about Sarah’s choices. Their are many liberals begging and pleading for Palin to run in 2012 – and she made their point this weekend.

    I’m gonna get some popcorn and a large drink – the Palin Circus is riveting entertainment. While she obviously has no place as a “leader”, I’d watch her reality TV show in a quick minute . . . she’s funnier than Flava Flav.

  • DaveR

    Just for information – those “Republicans” that also savaged her and her family – they AREN’T Right-wingers. Those are the RINO’s of the party that would be right at home with the Democrats. The Party won’t kick them out, because they are the friends of the ones in charge.

    And Fuster et al – your sides disgusting, slanderous attack or “ethics” violations did their job of getting her out of office so ya’ll can “claim” she’s a “quitter”. But beware to reap what you sow.

  • http://www.bobhunkins.com HunkybobTX

    QOD:
    “This woman taps some deep-seated Freudian place that still confounds me as an observer. She’s beautiful. She’s smart. She’s a mother. She’s flawed. She’s sexy. She’s ambitious. She’s married. She’s a regular person. She’s an outsider. She’s a spoiler. She has, gasp!, long hair.”

    Dittos…I’m not sure what it is about Palin, but people either love her guts or hate her guts.

  • fuster

    Dave, I don’t side with the personal attacks. Some of the things said about her children are so far out of the bounds of decency that i’m offended to be linked with them. When I’ve read such stuff, I’ve responded to the remark and the author of them.
    However, you can’t really say that the attacks have driven her out of office, because it’s entirely unclear why she’s leaving.

  • http://blahgwrite.blogspot.com Mat

    Melissa,

    I agree with the article. My point is that the long-term consequences of just up and quitting (yes, I did say that) may hurt her. If it doesn’t, then she will write a new page on how to do politics. However, my gut instinct at this time tells me that this incident will be a problem in the future. Personally, I’d much rather have her than Romney or even Jindal at this point.

  • Chalmers

    Fester,

    Do you describe President Obama as a “quitter?” How long did he represent the great state of Illinois before he started his 18 month run for President prior to his resignation in advance of his term ending?

  • DaveR

    Dang it Chal, you’re not suppose to bring up facts so soon!!! I was hoping we’d get 10-15 more posts out of them. :-)

  • http://www.tomllewis.com/ tomllewis

    I LOVE every word you wrote.

  • http://www.health1texas.com Kory

    Brilliant observation and writing. I hope she gets her own talk show so she can tell the Leterman’s of the world to, “kiss it” !

  • fuster

    No, Chalmers, i don’t usually describe people people who’re elected to higher office as quitters. I didn’t apply that label to palin when she ran for VP, and would not have applied it to her had she been elected and resigned the governorship.
    I don’t see this resignation as analogous.

  • J David

    It takes a person of HIGHEST ETHICS to spare taxpayers and constituents, generally,the huge, and daily increasing financial burden of spurious lawsuits against a highly competent/ successful, and obviously politically dangerous conservative rather than making taxpayers foot the bill.
    Without exception, I view EVERY self-proclaimed conservative askance when they denigrate Palin in any way, and must call into question their veracity, or what about themselves they are referring to as “conservative”. A good many of them seem to be RINOs or “fiscal conservatives”, that also proclaim the Era of Reagan to be over, and wish to kow-tow to their new commie overlords as the toadies they really are turning out to be.
    Incidentally, the Obamunist did 143 days of chamber-time in the Senate before quitting his constituents, having accomplished ZILCH!

  • Pingback: Sarah’s Critics Are Reading Her, and History, Wrong. : The Sundries Shack

  • Trish

    Fuster–

    You SHOULD describe Obama as a quitter, because he left us high and dry in Illinois. He didn’t do the job we elected him to do.
    He didn’t even TRY to do the job that we elected him to do.

  • http://genuinegopmom.blogspot.com Lisa Graas

    Love your blog.

    I have to take issue on your suggestion that those who support Sarah Palin strongly are “worshipping” her. I don’t care to go into the depths of my faith life, so you’ll just have to trust me when I say I am a faithful Catholic who defines worship as offering the sacrifice that is due only to God. I know the difference, but I am a diehard Palin supporter.

    What is the difference between “Palinistas” and “Obamabots”? It’s all very simple. Ask any Obamabot to delineate precisely what Obama’s positions are on critical issues and you will be met with very little substance. Ask any Palinista to do the same and you will invariably be offered details with more substance than you would probably care to digest.

    Caring about issues deeply and knowing what a load of crap is heading out of the White House these days tends to make people more excited about the person they see as most capable of bringing about the desperately needed changes that need to occur. REFORM is a huge issue and I can tell you all about how Palin has accomplished this in her career.

    It’s not worship. I know what worship is. I do it every day for the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit, offering my body as a living sacrifice to Him, as St. Paul said we should all do. My goodness, my admiration for Palin comes NOWHERE NEAR what I offer to my Lord……but I am passionate about change and I do see that she is the best vehicle for that change that I have seen in my lifetime. Personally, I see more in her than I did in Ronald Reagan because she is a mom like me.

    I invite you to put my claim to the test. Ask Obamabots and Palinistas to delineate the details on issues.

    Many thanks.

    Lisa

  • ThomasD

    Patterico… asks, “Is it verboten to criticize Palin?”

    Heavens. That question is either so meta I cannot wrap my head around it or it is simply a shameless plea for traffic.

    It’s a toss up.

  • http://www.tomllewis.com/ tomllewis

    As to Patterico who asks, “Is it verboten to criticize Palin?”

    I say, of course not. My objections are one of tone. I criticized many things GWB did (especially on the spending side), but I never hated, or even ridiculed him for it. There’s plenty to be critical of any human being, no matter how talented.

    My bottom line with her is still to wait & see. The criticisms may be well founded, or maybe not.

    Tony Blankley wrote a good article today on Palin: One, of many, good quotes is: “They may be listening for someone who knows how to talk to us- rather than at us or down to us.” http://bit.ly/zmfCZ

  • bandit

    I’m down with what you’re saying. She’s probably sick of being used by people to express their hatred and figures she can make a ton of cash. There are a lot fewer regrets walking your own path and leaving on your own terms than trying to please other people all the time.