Comments on: How Can You Claim Moral Superiority Voting For Bob Barr?–UPDATED

By: moncler coats

moncler coats — Fri, 03 Dec 2010 06:35:00 +0000

Communication is key to any healthy relationship as it lets you share your feelings and tackle problems together.

By: Jeff B.

Jeff B. — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 04:35:35 +0000

Would there be a Tea Party movement with John McCain as President?

By: nike shox

nike shox — Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:34:22 +0000

Searching for this for some time now – i guess luck is more advanced than search engines

By: cheap nikeshox

cheap nikeshox — Thu, 27 May 2010 14:21:27 +0000

I like it, very good
I like it, very good, Particularly in the Authority pages.

By: Philip

Philip — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:20:10 +0000

I did happen to vote for Barr in ’08, and I’ve never even been a Libertarian–in fact, I have some serious disagreements with that party. However, living in New York as I do, it became clear that a vote for McCain would be just as “wasted” as a vote for anyone other than His Holiness (as I like to call him). So I was glad for the chance to cast my vote on principle, indeed, because as time has gone on, though as said I have some considerable disagreements with the Libs, many of their other ideas have become more appealing to me. This is the sort of thing that can happen when one reads the Constitution closely, I guess.

(I almost did vote Rep in the end due to Palin’s presence on the ticket, but she wasn’t quite enough to nudge it over the bar in my view.)

So my view is that for a voter in a Dem-dominated state, a vote for Barr is nothing to feel sorry about.

By: fuster

fuster — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:24:25 +0000

You’re all jerking yourselves if you think that there’s any meaning to Barr with or without Palin’s detracting from a vote total that might have swelled montrously all the way to a full one per cent.

By: largebill

largebill — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:25:31 +0000

While McQ may be right that Bob Barr did not change the landscape that is only because of the addition of Gov. Palin to the McCain ticket. Prior to McCain selecting Palin as his running mate Barr would likely have received many more protest votes and there would have been a lot more folks just staying home.

By: seekeronos

seekeronos — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:49:34 +0000

The GOP on the national level, is a dead man walking at this point.

It will never be able to reclaim power in its current form.

And with the big money donors dictating that milquetoast moderates such as McCain and Mitt Romney (who are only slightly less advocates of Big Government solutions to our problems than Obama)… I see little hope for it.

Vote Constitutionalist!

http://www.constitutionparty.org

By: TFMo

TFMo — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:03:00 +0000

While the Barr vote had little-to-no effect on Obama’s numbers, add to it the Stay-At-Homers.

I voted McCain (or more accurately Palin) and got lambasted a few times as a RINO, that I should vote for Barr, vote for Obama, or just stay home to “teach the GOP a lesson. My response was 1: Barr was not going to get anywhere. Period. Waste of time, waste of vote. 2: Vote for Obama. To teach the GOP a lesson. Riiiiiight. Punish the GOP for leaning liberal by voting for the most liberal Senator in office, more liberal than the proud SOCIALIST Senator. That’s like a dieter punishing himself for eating a donut by devouring an entire wedding cake, topped off with a 3 pound bag of sugar. 3: Stay at home. Smart. I’m sure that the Dems would follow suit and stay home too. Right. Gotcha. IDIOTS.

John McCain is a five gallon bucket of crap. Obama is ten gallons of crap in a five gallon bucket. Whether or not they are crap is not the question; they obviously are. The question is just how much do you want on your shoes?

By: J David

J David — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:43:24 +0000

Reagan did not compromise, Reagan convinced, he educated, he was a personable, but flat-out enemy of the socialism that once took him in when he was a liberal. He knew what liberalism REALLY is, because he had been one, and realized it represented the ultimate overthrow of the United States of America, literally. He was able to explain it to others, and to explain conservatism, something which the RINO Party collaborators are not even trying to do, because they are soulless/mercenary/amoral/pragmatists who are playing the game for themselves alone, like the Reichstag that compromised with the National Socialist German Worker’s Party of the mid-Thirties.