Comments on: Another Terrorist Dry Run: Part II Interview With Witness Dr. Keith Robinson–UPDATED

By: O Bloody Hell

O Bloody Hell — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 05:08:45 +0000

> So unclench those sphincters and let your bigotry go. It was a language problem, nothing more.

Yes, I’m fully trusting an organization that wants to sweep it under the rug to tell me the truth.

The BEST data that this isn’t what it claims to be is the fact that Fox and someone like Beck haven’t jumped onto it, getting the whole host of substantial data that should exist — there have to be incident reports and depositions entered in the aftermath of it, which would, if not have the whole truth, would certainly show if it was serious or not.

That they have not suggests that it is being blown out of proportion, and makes me question the veracity of some of the reports that make a big deal out of it.

By: Adam

Adam — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:30:10 +0000

lanquage barrier, don’t think so. I highly doubt these jerks weren’t all on their first plane ride and didn’t know the rules, half of which are put in pictures. They were messing around in a place they shouldn’t be, and all deserved a good beating at the very least. Instead, as described, they were likely playing the system fishing for a lawsuit or some other provocation.

By: JakiChan

JakiChan — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:40:30 +0000

Hey, guess what. It’s all a scam:

http://www.ajc.com/business/airtran-hero-wasn-t-226517.html

“But there was no way Petruna could have seen what he described on Flight 297, AirTran said in a statment. Petruna departed from Akron-Canton, Ohio, on AirTran Flight 205 on Nov. 17, officials said. He was supposed to connect to Flight 297 to head home to Houston, but he missed his first flight out of Ohio. And therefore, he missed the connecting flight.

“Flight 297, the flight which Mr. Patruna allegedly wrote a first-hand account of, originally pushed back from its gate in Atlanta at 4:40 p.m. EST, a full 26 minutes before flight 205 arrived at the gate in Atlanta making this flight connection impossible,” according to AirTran.”

So unclench those sphincters and let your bigotry go. It was a language problem, nothing more.

By: Tonestaple

Tonestaple — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:23:51 +0000

I have to support the lawsuit theory. Lawsuits are horrible things and those at the receiving end, especially big corporations, are often eager to settle to make the whole thing go away. This would net these Arab turkeys some cash. Additionally, every time these Arab turkeys win something like this, like the flying imams in Minneapolis, the airlines become a little more reluctant to make Arabs/Muslims behave properly. Airlines hate to be sued, and nowadays no large corporation has any stomach at all for lawsuits which allege any kind of discrimination. The publicity is too awful for them and there are too many fools eager to believe any charge of racism just because a charge was made.

The goal of this misbehavior is first to wear down our resistance until it once again becomes possible for them to take over planes in flight and, a distant second, to score some cash.

By: John Branch

John Branch — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:29:42 +0000

Having read Tedd Petruna’s account plus some of the news reports, including an interview with another passenger that was published in an Atlanta newspaper, I have trouble telling exactly what happened and also have trouble concluding that the incident was a “dry run.” Dry run for what? I doubt that terrorists will try to take over a plane before it has left the ground; it’s simply an undesirable tactical situation compared to taking over a plane that’s in the air. But the situation in question was exactly that of a plane on the ground.

A group of Middle Eastern men who don’t speak English, some of whom behave in an unruly way, isn’t the same thing as a threat.

By: Jim Davis

Jim Davis — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:58:12 +0000

If, knowing what we know now about Muslim men, isn’t enough “help” for you to understand the threat, then you really do need some “HELP.”

Please seek help immediately – before the terrorists help you with another terrorist attack.

By: DaveR

DaveR — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:14:07 +0000

Will – you’re probably one of those that screamed the loudest about the Bush Administration not “connecting the dots” – when AFTER the fact, it was KNOWN that all the dots were there (also forgetting that Pres. Clinton made it ILLEGAL to connect those dots…).

LIVES are MORE IMPORTANT that offending someone. If they don’t like the way things are run here in this country, they can go back to their own. (you also seem to keep forgetting that they want us DEAD…)

By: Peter

Peter — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:15:05 +0000

If they are Arabic they are likely Muslim. That means they read books & material thats instructs them to view non Muslims, infidels, as apes & pigs or meat in general they can kill in jihad to get a free pass to their version of Heaven. That’s a threat. Reference any of the 14,000+ Islamic terror attacks since 9/11 for example.

By: Pat

Pat — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:25:15 +0000

Did you read the original email/letter from Tedd Petruna? That’s the most detailed description I’ve seen.

By: Bookworm Room » The terrorists are, apparently, still probing our weaknesses

Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:11:43 +0000

[...] LeGrand’s Pink Flamingo Bar about another possible terrorist dry run. Melissa Clouthier now has more. I’ll blog later, but have to work. Share With [...]