<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climategate: Global Warming &amp; Ridiculing The Ridiculous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://melissablogs.com/2009/12/07/climategate-global-warming-ridiculing-the-ridiculous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://melissablogs.com/2009/12/07/climategate-global-warming-ridiculing-the-ridiculous/</link>
	<description>Information Pollination</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 05:10:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveR</title>
		<link>http://melissablogs.com/2009/12/07/climategate-global-warming-ridiculing-the-ridiculous/comment-page-1/#comment-17750</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melissaclouthier.com/?p=15338#comment-17750</guid>
		<description>Again - Huh???

Who&#039;s out to get me?  Trying to change the subject?  This United States Marine isn&#039;t worried about anybody &quot;out to get me&quot;.

And he IS part of the lies.  This ENTIRE story you linked and his premise was based on the falsified and &quot;LOST&quot; data, that&#039;s already been PROVEN wrong by their OWN emails.  It&#039;s in the last two paragraphs - but you probably didn&#039;t read that far, because the first part of the story make your argument &quot;look good&quot;, and the last few paragraphs say where he&#039;s getting his &quot;facts&quot;.  Open your eyes and actually LEARN something.

There is no science that they are using.  The &quot;science&quot; they are using is the same as the &quot;consensus&quot; in 1492 that the world was flat &quot;because&quot; a bunch of people said so.  REAL science isn&#039;t about &quot;consensus&quot;, it&#039;s about Fact.  Columbus (and later Magellan) proved that &quot;consensus&quot; wrong by what?  Facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again &#8211; Huh???</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s out to get me?  Trying to change the subject?  This United States Marine isn&#8217;t worried about anybody &#8220;out to get me&#8221;.</p>
<p>And he IS part of the lies.  This ENTIRE story you linked and his premise was based on the falsified and &#8220;LOST&#8221; data, that&#8217;s already been PROVEN wrong by their OWN emails.  It&#8217;s in the last two paragraphs &#8211; but you probably didn&#8217;t read that far, because the first part of the story make your argument &#8220;look good&#8221;, and the last few paragraphs say where he&#8217;s getting his &#8220;facts&#8221;.  Open your eyes and actually LEARN something.</p>
<p>There is no science that they are using.  The &#8220;science&#8221; they are using is the same as the &#8220;consensus&#8221; in 1492 that the world was flat &#8220;because&#8221; a bunch of people said so.  REAL science isn&#8217;t about &#8220;consensus&#8221;, it&#8217;s about Fact.  Columbus (and later Magellan) proved that &#8220;consensus&#8221; wrong by what?  Facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://melissablogs.com/2009/12/07/climategate-global-warming-ridiculing-the-ridiculous/comment-page-1/#comment-17748</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melissaclouthier.com/?p=15338#comment-17748</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, he&#039;s part of that great global conspiracy called science. How do you even leave the house if you think everyone is out to get you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, he&#8217;s part of that great global conspiracy called science. How do you even leave the house if you think everyone is out to get you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveR</title>
		<link>http://melissablogs.com/2009/12/07/climategate-global-warming-ridiculing-the-ridiculous/comment-page-1/#comment-17745</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melissaclouthier.com/?p=15338#comment-17745</guid>
		<description>Again Mike - what&#039;s that have to do with GLOBAL WARMING.

Sure it works GREAT in a GREENHOUSE and a LAB - where it&#039;s CONTROLLED to help PLANTS grow!  

(Hint: You&#039;ll notice that all the predictions listed in that story NEVER CAME TO PASS - or did you just ignore that part on purpose?)

Added:  and the WRITER is part of the PROBLEM, but then again, you can&#039;t seem to understand that.

&quot;Stefan Rahmstorf is professor of physics of the oceans at Potsdam University and department head at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again Mike &#8211; what&#8217;s that have to do with GLOBAL WARMING.</p>
<p>Sure it works GREAT in a GREENHOUSE and a LAB &#8211; where it&#8217;s CONTROLLED to help PLANTS grow!  </p>
<p>(Hint: You&#8217;ll notice that all the predictions listed in that story NEVER CAME TO PASS &#8211; or did you just ignore that part on purpose?)</p>
<p>Added:  and the WRITER is part of the PROBLEM, but then again, you can&#8217;t seem to understand that.</p>
<p>&#8220;Stefan Rahmstorf is professor of physics of the oceans at Potsdam University and department head at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://melissablogs.com/2009/12/07/climategate-global-warming-ridiculing-the-ridiculous/comment-page-1/#comment-17744</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melissaclouthier.com/?p=15338#comment-17744</guid>
		<description>Hey Dave there&#039;s this thing called Google, try it!
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09340/1018512-109.stm

You can read how the Greenhouse Effect was discovered in 1824!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave there&#8217;s this thing called Google, try it!<br />
<a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09340/1018512-109.stm" rel="nofollow">http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09340/1018512-109.stm</a></p>
<p>You can read how the Greenhouse Effect was discovered in 1824!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveR</title>
		<link>http://melissablogs.com/2009/12/07/climategate-global-warming-ridiculing-the-ridiculous/comment-page-1/#comment-17742</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melissaclouthier.com/?p=15338#comment-17742</guid>
		<description>Huh Mike??

What&#039;s your little lab thing have to do with Global warming?  That&#039;s the WHOLE problem - it hasn&#039;t been PROVEN that CO2 affects the temp - OR - the temp affects the CO2 levels.  That&#039;s the DATA that was &quot;lost/deleted/thrown away&quot; (yeah, right), and was &quot;adjusted&quot; by a inaccurate computer model program (which HAS been looked at and proven to be not-reliable).  

How did the earth warm up after the last ice age?  There weren&#039;t any SUV&#039;s burning up fossil fuels, where there?  How did the earth COOL off to bring on that ice age?  There weren&#039;t any coal fired power plants to load up the atmosphere with anything?  It&#039;s funny how they WON&#039;T answer those very simple questions (because their faulty computer model can&#039;t answer them accurately either!!), but yet expect us to believe what they say (again - WITHOUT PROVIDING PROOF) now??

Quit drinking the koolaid - and learn something for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh Mike??</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your little lab thing have to do with Global warming?  That&#8217;s the WHOLE problem &#8211; it hasn&#8217;t been PROVEN that CO2 affects the temp &#8211; OR &#8211; the temp affects the CO2 levels.  That&#8217;s the DATA that was &#8220;lost/deleted/thrown away&#8221; (yeah, right), and was &#8220;adjusted&#8221; by a inaccurate computer model program (which HAS been looked at and proven to be not-reliable).  </p>
<p>How did the earth warm up after the last ice age?  There weren&#8217;t any SUV&#8217;s burning up fossil fuels, where there?  How did the earth COOL off to bring on that ice age?  There weren&#8217;t any coal fired power plants to load up the atmosphere with anything?  It&#8217;s funny how they WON&#8217;T answer those very simple questions (because their faulty computer model can&#8217;t answer them accurately either!!), but yet expect us to believe what they say (again &#8211; WITHOUT PROVIDING PROOF) now??</p>
<p>Quit drinking the koolaid &#8211; and learn something for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://melissablogs.com/2009/12/07/climategate-global-warming-ridiculing-the-ridiculous/comment-page-1/#comment-17741</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melissaclouthier.com/?p=15338#comment-17741</guid>
		<description>Look you are free to believe that Jesus rode on the backs of dinosaurs. Fine. But you can demonstrate in a lab that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and the amount of carbon dioxide in the air can be measured. So why is this a political debate? Maybe global warming won&#039;t be that bad, but it is settled science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look you are free to believe that Jesus rode on the backs of dinosaurs. Fine. But you can demonstrate in a lab that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and the amount of carbon dioxide in the air can be measured. So why is this a political debate? Maybe global warming won&#8217;t be that bad, but it is settled science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

