Maybe I’ve Had It Wrong All Along: I Shoulda Been A Guy Blogger

December 15, 2009 / 12:11 pm • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

Is a woman an “Uncle Tom” if she writes under a male pseudonym? What if she gets paid more and seemingly more respect by doing so?

Also, would a woman write differently if she “wrote like a man”. If I didn’t have the cultural pressures, would I write differently? More forceful, more tough, maybe?

Here’s what prompted this post:

A blogger for Copyblogger, who wrote under the name “James Chartrand,” outed herself as a female, explaining that she chose a male name to earn more money and get more respect in her career.

Years ago The Blogger Formerly Known As James Chartrand (who declined to identify her real name) hit a plateau in her career. She couldn’t command a higher rate. She lost gigs she should have gotten. Things were looking grim. So she distanced herself from her existing company by choosing a pen name: “I picked a name that sounded to me like it might convey a good business image. Like it might command respect.”

She chose a male pen name. Ha, more like penis name!

Choosing a male pen name seemed to fix everything for James Chartrand. She put food on the table for her kids and get a mortgage for her house near her mom.

This blogger, a woman, came to this conclusion:

Honestly, there is something rather Uncle Tom-y about Chartrand hiding behind the opposite gender. By assuming the identity of a male writer, she skirted the discrimination against women entirely while doing nothing to change womens’ lot. She just left the glass ceiling standing there, rather than shattering it.

Sure, “passing” was Chartrand’s choice, and as Charlotte York would say, she chose her choice. But it showed no solidarity for other women at all. There’s plenty of female writers out there who confront the marginalization of women head on, pointing out how with factual data how they’ve been shortchanged, asking for raises, taking their brilliant work elsewhere if their bosses refuse to budge. But “James Chartrand” took the easy way out.

Eh. I don’t know. If I wanted to make a lot of money, I’d “sell out” and be a mommy blogger and talk about my kid’s poop or the fact that I forgot part of my kid’s homework or that my jeans are tight or whatever else was personally ailing me at the moment. As far as I can tell, being snarky, female and into fashion, celebrities or some other (what I consider) trivialities can net a gal big bucks.

Or, I could sell out and go anonymous male and people would give me more respect and more money.

Maybe.

  • http://urbangrounds.com Robbie

    I’m an actual male blogger, and that hasn’t seemed to make a difference in rolling in the big bucks from blogging (or the lack of rolling in the big bucks, more accurately).

    And in my professional, full-time writing career…I don’t believe there is any diff in salaries of female vs. male writers.

  • http://www.sundriesshack.com Jimmie

    “James” had a choice between fighting the patriarchy and taking care of her family. She made the right choice so far as I’m concerned.

    It’s awfully damned easy to excoriate someone for not fighting the War for Wymyn when you’re already living in Fat City (take a look at the list of Favorite Stores in her bio).

    Instead of putting on her snark hat, Ms. Well-Paid House Blogger for a Fluff Site might ask herself why Chartrand wrote this article now. I’d suggest that the evidence Chartrand collected is a far more powerful weapon to break any glass ceilings than anything that blogger could have provided.

  • mj

    Perhaps she should just claim to be a “male writer trapped in the body of a woman.”

  • http://www.peekinthewell.net/blog/ Morgan K Freeberg

    If all the lady-bloggers make half what I make, and all the fellas make double, that’d suit me just fine.