But I do laugh at one thing: Chuckles all but tells his minions (except for KKKilgore’s attacks and a smattering of comments elsewhere) that appearing on “teabagger” sites is verboten. Whenever they (in this case, JV benchwarmers like lucky and RWC) do appear, they routinely get slapped around, retreat behind the Green Wall, and hurl insults from there.

Then again, “Once a bear is hooked on garbage, there’s no cure.”

http://siteanalytics.compete.com/littlegreenfootballs.com/

Looks like a few of Charles’ sycophants have popped in. Is that you, Sharmuta and Killgore?

obviously lucky and “Rightwingconspirator” love to play Chucky’s “six degrees to Himmler” game where everybody not named Charles Johnson can eventually linked to Himmler, facts or reason be damned. But if “lucky” and RWC are the best he can summon to raid sites (especially since KKKilgore only works at 3AM), then that site certainly has gone down the toilet.

Oh, and Chuckles, since you scour the innertubes looking for references to yourself:
you need to get out of that “gated(read: padded)” community a little more. You are looking too fat and pale to be a Californian.

I, too, live in Texas. Austin to be exact. Brainwashing works both ways. Last time I checked, there wasn’t a push by the far left to alter the way certain matters were handled in the classroom; that applies particularly to the issues I raised earlier this morning. The issue of global warming isn’t debatable — we’ve come out of a prolonged ice age and we know the earth has gone through these cycles long before mankind walked the earth (which is one of the points of contention I have when it comes to allowing zealous creationists to peddle their faith off as part of a “science” curriculum when it may merit mention at home and in church but NOT in school).

In my SBoE district (10), we have a run off between a former educator and a lawyer who homeschools; as a Republican (so designated by the stamp on my voter ID card on Tuesday), I have quite a choice to make. The homeschooler is running on a “values” agenda and, unfortunately, so is the educator. So it boils down to deciding between an educator who has been in the system and has chosen it for all her kids and who isn’t as brazen about wanting to teach “competing” theories or for this lawyer who wants to set rules for everyone else’s kids to play by (he hasn’t said if he’ll ever send his children to public schools if elected to SBoE).

I posted a robocall on youtube Monday afternoon. That call was made from a pro-life PAC on behalf of Mister Homeschool, noting that he’s “staunchly pro-life” and “the only candidate to score 100%” on their survey.

http://tfninsider.org/2010/03/01/now-theyre-dragging-abortion-into-it/

Now please tell me what being 100% staunchly pro-life has to do with what the SBoE does, aside from mandating materials related to health education. How does that qualify a patent lawyer above either of his two opponents (the vote was nearly evenly split in thirds — 35/35/30) who have actual education experience and whose children have been or are in public schools? How will that affect the balance of the curriculum as it relates to reading, writing, and the sciences (including math)? And how is that of benefit to parents who want their children to receive a good comprehensive education rather than what some moralist authoritarian crackpot thinks is deficient — lack of God, lack of “competing” theories — in a system in which his children don’t participate?