Is The Health Care Fight Obscuring A Criminal Cover-Up In The Obama White House?

March 18, 2010 / 12:38 pm • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

Great investigative journalism by The American Spectator’s Jeffrey Lord:

Even as the drama of health care carries the headlines, beneath the surface, visible now, the iceberg of scandal ripples.

First, the timeline on the blossoming scandal upon which we will now officially fix the dreaded “gate” descriptive. Jobsgate.

• September 27, 2009 — The Denver Post reports that Obama White House Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina allegedly offered a job in the Obama administration to ex-Colorado House Speaker Andrew Romanoff if Romanoff dropped his planned primary challenge to incumbent U.S. Senator Michael Bennet. Romanoff refuses comment and runs anyway.

• February 18, 2010 — Philadelphia TV anchor Larry Kane reports that on his just taped Comcast show, he had asked Democratic Congressman Joe Sestak, who is challenging incumbent Senator Arlen Specter whether it was true that the Obama administration had offered Sestak a job if he would withdraw from his primary challenge to Specter. Sestak answers “yes,” specifically saying the offer came from someone in the White House and that he, Sestak, turned down the offer. Sestak refuses to name who it was that made the offer. Two hours later, Kane calls the White House, plays them the tape, and asks for comment. The White House never calls him back.

Lord continues…explaining why Holder’s Justice Department might not be investigating:

One former high-ranking Justice Department official, after telling me that there were indeed problems with the Department’s silence on this issue, said that in the current political climate at the Holder-run Justice Department, any Justice official who sought to go to Holder with thoughts of investigating Messina or his boss Rahm Emanuel or anyone else in the White House would have to have “brass balls.” A colorful way of saying that Justice Department officials are being intimidated from pursuing the truth, no matter where it leads. Let’s go back to Congressman Darrell Issa.

Issa has stepped up to the plate and sent his letter to White House Counsel Bauer, who now holds the job in the legal precincts of the White House one frequented by Nixon’s John Dean. Bauer, it should be noted, is the husband of now-departed Glenn Beck foil Anita Dunn, briefly the Obama White House Communications Director. Bauer and Dunn have been featured in Newsweek as one of ten “global power couples,” ranking them alongside — honest — Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, Bill and Hillary, Beyonce and Jay Z, and Nestor Kirchner and Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, Argentina’s back-to-back presidents. All of which means, according to Newsweek, the Bauer/Dunn power-combo has power, lots of it. The Congressman has formally requested an answer to his letter — from Bauer — by March 18.

And here are the implications [I hope you'll go read the whole thing. The story is damning.]

If in fact Sestak is telling the truth, if in fact the Denver Post story about Andrew Romanoff is correct — and neither Sestak nor Romanoff reported these offers to federal authorities — Specter is saying both could in fact do jail time for committing a felony.

Even more remarkable is to comprehend why Robert Gibbs may now be standing at that White House podium five different times and refusing to answer questions from Jake Tapper and Major Garrett. If Sestak has told the truth, if the Denver Post got it right — then not only is the person or persons within the White House who made these job offers in big trouble, but anybody else on the Obama White House staff who currently knows this has happened and has not reported it to the proper authorities — the FBI, just for starters — is, according to Specter, a potential prosecution target for “misprision of a felony.” For which this person or persons could also go to jail along with whomever offered the jobs in the first place.

Quite possibly, that could include Robert Gibbs, if in fact he knows these job offers occurred.

So, keep an eye on this story guys. The President and his staff could be in big trouble. This administration is laughable on transparency. What a disgusting mess.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • DaveR

    These people need to be so far UNDER a jail cell, it’s not imaginable.

    Holder right along with them.

    There has GOT to be something WE can do (since the people who are SUPPOSE to be the Check and Balance to this are IN ON IT!).

  • http://www.hookersandbooze.com/ ArmedGeek

    There has GOT to be something WE can do

    Sure there’s something that could be done. I don’t think people are there yet.

    Here’s the thing .. The wackos are currently in charge of everything. There’s no one to report this to. The DOJ isn’t going to investigate, Congress is not going to investigate, the news media is not going to talk about it.

  • Pingback: The Anchoress | A First Things Blog

  • Pingback: Criminal Coverup in the White House? Figures… « Obi’s Sister

  • patently

    This is just completely ridiculous. There are real scandals going on. Can we just concentrate on reality here? This kind of stuff makes us sound crazy.

  • DaveR

    Ahh…so because someone else is breaking a “bigger” law, we’re just suppose to over look this? Come on patently, you SHOULD know better than that.

  • fuster

    Dave. I think that this isn’t much. Remind us of where the crime lies in asking someone if he would prefer a job in the executive branch instead of entering a primary”

  • DaveR

    It’s not even worth it to explain fussy – YOU wouldn’t understand. And go ahead and come back with a pithy comment – ALL the facts are in the story above. It’s ILLEGAL and the Holder Justice Department WON’T DO ANYTHING about it.

    And we all know that you think it’s OK when Dem’s do things that are Illegal, you don’t have to keep telling us that.

  • fuster

    Sorry Dave. I would have no trouble understanding. Unfortunately, you won’t make the attempt because you can’t present a convincing case. There’s way too much missing and about barely enough there to open an investigation.

    But I invite you to try, Dave. Calling me fussy ain’t getting you nothing but laughed at.

  • DaveR

    Wow fussy – you really didn’t even read the whole link did you? it’s there there. Took me about 3 minutes to find.

    http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/29/600

    18 U.S.C. § 600 : US Code – Section 600: Promise of employment or other benefit for political activity

    Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment,
    position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit,
    provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of
    Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such
    benefit, to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any
    political activity or for the support of or opposition to any
    candidate or any political party in connection with any general or
    special election to any political office, or in connection with any
    primary election or political convention or caucus held to select
    candidates for any political office, shall be fined under this
    title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

  • fuster

    good start dave. you’ve posted a description of a misdemeanor.
    now when do you link this up to some evidence that there was a violation of same?

    anonymous sources, anonymous solicitations, and third-party allegations aren’t evidence.

  • DaveR

    Get off your fricken high horse fussy – you’ve called for JAIL time for Pres. Bush and VP Cheney because a soldier in Iraq make a prisoner put underwear on their head – because the people on YOUR side wanna call it “torture”. You’ve done in RIGHT here on Melissa’s site. When a soldier screws up and goes to trial (the SYSTEM actually WORKING because someone BROKE the rules), that’s not enough – Bush and Cheney MUST be guilty too.

    NOW since it’s YOUR guys in trouble – it’s all just “hearsay”??? When it’s third-party allegations against a Republican, you seem to believe it 10,000%, but when it’s against a Dem, it’s false? You can’t have it both ways. (well, YOU can, because you can’t even tell yourself the truth)

    If you believe what your spouting, I have a tropical island in North Dakota you need to buy. Priced to move!

  • fuster

    fine attempt to lay out some evidence, dave.
    fine attempt indeed.

    who’s my guy? and what trouble is he in?
    you don’t even have a name to attach to any offer being made, do you?

    how much “trouble” can it be, dave, if you’ve got no one to put in it?

    as I said at the start, it’s not much.