What Was Wrong At The Southern Republican Leadership Conference?–UPDATED

April 12, 2010 / 10:48 am • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

What a weird conference. There. I said it. The Tea Party received the biggest cheers. The Republicans bashed their own party. Attendees were optimistic and cheerful. Politicians were purposeful and focused on 2010–a marked shift from the usual perspectives at SRLC which has been a conference that gives voters a first look at potential Presidential candidates. Ron Paul’s groupies were suitably worshipful and idealistic. Mitt Romney’s posse were mission-focuses as always. But something was off.

It wasn’t the city or weather. New Orleans was more beautiful than I have ever seen it and the weather was perfect. Food? A+. Gambling? I wouldn’t know, but people had fun. A shooting did clear a friend’s restaurant, though–so it’s the same old New Orleans we know and love.

It wasn’t the venue or organization which was okay–although the scheduling was unorthodox. The speakers didn’t get going until the afternoon every day while the delegates had various brunches. It made for an excellent blogging schedule.

What simmered below the surface of the event, though, made me uneasy. And it was who didn’t attend the event that concerned me.

Eventually, Mitt Romney is going to have to show up at an conference with other political contenders. Will he get more cheers than Newt or Sarah or Mike Pence or Rick Perry? I know he’s hoping to wait them all out, gather to himself a gagilliion dollars and be the presumptive nominee. That method worked in the past, will it work now?

Haley Barbour endorsed Charlie Crist who is miles behind Marco Rubio. Barbour was RNC chair during the 1994 revolution. Many of these old dogs are still around and enjoying power. They remember sweeping in and they don’t want to be swept out.

The recent arm wrestling being done by the NRSC and NRCC against the RNC might actually be wasted effort. If donors are by-passing all of them and funding the Rubios of the world, the party bosses might matter less even as the give full-throated endorsements to establishment candidates who have zero chance of getting elected.

One Republican said to me, “It’s like the Republicans are ten years behind the times. They’re looking for women candidates, when the voters are beyond that.”

What he meant was, the voters now, men and women, want a good candidate who follows, as Rick Perry mentioned, first principles. Gender matters little anymore. Beliefs matter most.

But first principles are inconvenient when an old-guard politician is trying to keep power and money. And so beneath a placid, optimist surface, there is struggling. The struggle would seem to be philosophical: big government Republicans against tax-assailing and small government conservatives with some Tea Party help.

Unfortunately, the struggle seems to be more base than that: who is going to man the ship when Republicans get power back in November? There are lots of Republicans angling for chairmanships and sweet deals and that seems to be a more important fight to them than fighting Democrats and a President who are trying to do to dismantle freedom and the American way.

Politics, like business, has many aging boomers who love their jobs. They don’t want to give them up. Terrified of becoming relics and irrelevant, they fight like badgers to hold on to personal power while not paying attention to what they’ll even be owning after they “win.” If the establishment Republicans rip the party apart, they may have power in a party that no longer matters. Do they recognize this reality?

Many of the old guard are suspicious of the Tea Partiers and conservatives in general. Cozying up with small government types, makes keeping a big government difficult.

Bottom line, the leadership of the party isn’t at the top anymore. The grassroots are leading, amoeba-like, toward a philosophical goal of smaller government, less taxation and more freedom. So far, no presumptive presidential candidate has taken on that mantal.

After the November mid-term elections, I expect a very wild presidential campaign. And while Mitt stuffed the ballot boxes at the Southern Republican Leadership Council, I don’t think his place as the new face of the GOP is anywhere near certain.

The Republican party will change, people will give them one last chance, because voters burned themselves with Ross Perot going third party. But if the party isn’t responsive to the base’s concern after the last two years, I’m afraid there will be a new party building and the old guard will be manning an empty ivory tower.

Tabitha Hale has more. She has a controversial take on the opening speaker who decided that the most important issue facing the nation is gay marriage.

Here are some interviews I conducted at SRLC:

Texas Governor Rick Perry Talks Texas….And A National Run? Also here.

Ted Cruz, former Texas Solicitor General who has argued many cases before the Supreme Court (and won) discusses the possible legal approaches to get rid of Obamacare. Also here.

A great Republican running against Deborah Wasserman-Schultz: Learn about Brian Reilly here.

I also got to spend 10 minutes with Herman Cain. That video is still loading, but I’ll add it to the cue.

UPDATED:

Liza over at Culture Kitchen gives me a back handed compliment and then dismisses a Rick Perry run for President because of his secession hyperbole while extolling Mitt Romney.

One word: Jobs

Texas has them. No other state comes close.

One phrase: It’s the economy stupid.

Rick Perry gets that, the Democrats don’t.

Now, Perry may have no chance to get elected, I don’t know. But please let’s not pretend that Romney doesn’t have baggage.

Can you say RomneyCare? And much as it pains me, his religion will still be a stopper for many people.

The press likes Romney way too much. Remember how they loved McCain? Yeah.

  • lawmom90

    I agree with you Melissa. If the GOP doesn’t get its “you know what” together soon and figure out the main planks of the platform, we will be drifting into a sea of oblivion and the Democrats will get to finish what they’ve started.

  • Steve

    Woa! I did not anticipate agreeing with you so much just from reading the title. Very good analysis and I’m right there with you.

  • http://www.resistnet.com DanFromMO

    Steele must go. He calls his own party racist and everyone runs to a microphone to claim how wonderfull he is! Disgusting. Because I am not racist, I insist he goes before I send another dime to the ‘Party’. I will support individual candidates and certain organizations. Steele, it is about how the organization is blowing our Donations on expensive, wastefull things and not on candidates. We must all sacrifice if we are going to save this country from Dhimmitude.

  • Pingback: SRLC Blogging: Day two & wrap up | RedState

  • gail

    I’m a texan. Rick Perry is not a conservative. i know all the media from without have bought him lock/stock and barrel. Rick Perry wanted to REQUIRE all girls 12 y/o and up be vaccinated for HPPV! is that who you want to get behind?
    Please, stop! Please stop saying he is someone he is not, he is NOT a conservative (he just likes to talk it when it is election time)

  • DaveR

    Any and all of the yahoo’s that ran for the Republican nomination for Pres. is ’08 need to GTFO and retire. None of them, NOT ONE of them, understand it’s because of THEM we lost. They are all BIG Government types (hence us calling them RINO’s), and love the power just as much as the Dem’s. Steele also must go.

    (Now I do understand they would all have been be better than BoBo, but to get this ship turned around, we don’t need any more Lib Lite’s in our Party.)

  • J David

    Gail dead right, Perry is not a conservative, but he is a really good faker.

    Romney’s win of the straw poll is OMINOUS indeed! It means most of the RINO Party’s “leadership”(in betrayal of first principles)has most definitely not learned their lessons (pragmatists are soulless, conscienceless, unprincipled entities whose only focus in the end is power by whatever means) as they are less about “the People” and more about themselves.

    The title “Republican” needs to be high-jacked for use by a new conservative party…as is done in business/sales all the time, typically to great effect.

  • http://midtownrepublican.com Georgeann King

    I attended the SRLC, too. I didn’t come away with the same impression you had. Your arguments are childish and sound like you and other bloggers didn’t get the attention you wanted.
    I listened to all the speeches and didn’t come to the same conclusions you did. Perhaps that was because I wasn’t looking to confirm my biases that the GOP needs shaking up (by the likes of you). I doubt you’d have liked anything they did.

  • http://www.coachmorse.com Coach Morse

    I’m an independent. voted for Perot. Never liked G.W. Voted for Obama, but would have voted for Romney had he been nominated by his party.
    Americans are looking for politicians to work together, find common ground, and get things done to move us “all” forward, imo. I hope candidates with extreme views will not be rewarded in the next election.
    Great post Melissa!
    cm

  • Joe McLain

    I think that Mitt Romney is the new face of the Republican party. I don’t know if he is the best choice but its his turn. Just like Mccain had his turn. I think that’s what Republicans do, they let the next guy in line have his turn regardless of their “electability”. Palin and Newt are damaged goods and I’m afraid that Mitt is going to stereotyped because of his Mormonism.

  • http://melissaclouthier.com Melissa

    Georgeann,

    I’m curious. What was your impression of the conference? You call me childish because I didn’t get attention? What? I’m a blogger. And like a reporter I reflect back what I see and experience–but with my pro-conservative-libertarian-Republican bias clearly stated.

    That does not mean that I’m going to not express what I see.

    As far as shaking up…are you suggesting that after humiliating losses in 2006 and 2008 that the Republican party should remain the same and continue on the same path? I want the party to survive and thrive…not become irrelevant or be so stupid, a third party becomes a de facto choice for many disgusted voters.

    What did you see at this conference? I want to know.

  • J David

    The Socialist Romney can’t win any more than Juan Amnesty McVain could, and the fact that, despite a looming third party explosion(which Palin will successfully join when the Dead Elephant Party rejects her, as it’s leadership has already done before)this doesn’t seem to be generally realized, should be an icewater douche to conservatives in the party.

  • Pingback: The Republicans and their slavery-and-seccession-loving states' rights problem | culturekitchen

  • http://mittromneycentral.com Nate G.

    Hi Melissa. I enjoyed your recap of the conference. I wish that I could have gone but was not able to. I’d like to add some comments and some minor corrections on some of your statements regarding Romney. Disclosure: I am a pro-Romney blogger. I attended CPAC, and in fact sat at the same table as you in the bloggers lounge. My comments:

    “Eventually, Mitt Romney is going to have to show up at an conference with other political contenders.” This makes it sound as if hasn’t attending anything, but as you know well he attended CPAC and had a great reception. Sarah and Huck were the ones who decided not to show up to that one. Newt and T-Paw both spoke. You’re wording makes it sound as if Romney is afraid to attend and he’s the only one skipping out.

    “Mitt stuffed the ballot boxes at the Southern Republican Leadership [Conference]” – An important distinction to make is that some Mitt supporters did the grunt work at SRLC and not Mitt himself nor his PAC. I spoke several times with Nancy French who was the coordinator of the pro-Mitt push at the conference. Being on the other side of the country I wasn’t able to help much in her recruiting of attendees, but she did make perfectly clear to me several times that under no circumstances would anyone involved in the event contact or communicate any staff member of Mitt’s PAC nor request any funding from them. All work and funding was done by the group “Evangelicals for Mitt” and their circle of friends and financiers. One additional point to make: there was no such effort at all at CPAC. Believe me I would know if there was, but there was not a hint of any extraneous planning or coordination to push the straw poll by the PAC or otherwise.

    “The press likes Romney way too much. Remember how they loved McCain? Yeah.” – As one who follows Romney news and tweets (religiously) I have to disagree with you on this point. I recognize the cycles of good press and bad press. To say the media likes Romney is not accurate as at least 90% of press over the last 2 months has been quite negative. There are exceptions of course. Hannity and K-Lo have remained complimentary, but the list who have spoke against Romney is 10 times longer. I assure you that any national affection for Romney is not media driven.

    Thanks for letting me leave a comment. I just felt those were important distinctions to make. I read your blog every once in awhile, but I always see you tweets and enjoy them. Will you be going to VVS also?
    -Nate G.

  • Suzu

    I’m a Ron Paul “groupie” who drove across five states to attend SRLC. I love Ron because he’s not afraid to speak the truth. He was the only one to acknowledge that our interventionist foreign policy is bankrupting the country. We have 700 military bases in 135 foreign countries. Those men ought to be redeployed to OUR southern border.

  • Nicole

    I think there’s something bigger than jobs with the conservatives and that’s religion – Mormon versus Evangelical. Makes a little more sense why Perry announced his day of prayer and fasting a few days before he threw his hat in the ring. I hate to see Christian Conservatives fall for this obvious tactic. I also hate to hear that Perry is better than Obama. We want more than that, don’t we? That’s an excuse to be for someone who is far from conservative.

    Perry managed to allow Texas to become over 50% illegals citizens.Rick Perry opposed Arizona enforcing the immigration law.The mandatory shots for Texas girls that citizens had to petition against also really turned me off. Turns out it was a private deal between Perry and the drug company. Strangely, conservatives no longer hold that against Perry. Remember we don’t have the shots because of the people’s outcry – not because of Perry.