Meanwhile, Mitt Still Can’t Win

October 31, 2011 / 5:39 pm • By Dr. Melissa Clouthier

In all of the Herman Cain hub-bub, George Will’s very thoughtful (and obvious) point that Mitt Romney can’t win the nomination gets lost.

For those who missed it, here’s what George Will said:

Romney, supposedly the Republican most electable next November, is a recidivist reviser of his principles who is not only becoming less electable; he might damage GOP chances of capturing the Senate. Republican successes down the ticket will depend on the energies of the Tea Party and other conservatives, who will be deflated by a nominee whose blurry profile in caution communicates only calculated trimming.

Republicans may have found their Michael Dukakis, a technocratic Massachusetts governor who takes his bearings from “data” (although there is precious little to support Romney’s idea that in-state college tuition for children of illegal immigrants is a powerful magnet for such immigrants) and who believes elections should be about (in Dukakis’s words) “competence,” not “ideology.” But what would President Romney competently do when not pondering ethanol subsidies that he forthrightly says should stop sometime before “forever”? Has conservatism come so far, surmounting so many obstacles, to settle, at a moment of economic crisis, for this?

No one wants to talk about this little detail.

Romney will do fine with some independents but 75% of his own party does not like him. This matters. This matters for volunteers, ground game and enthusiasm.

Anyway, I said this a month ago and I say it again, Mitt is a problematic candidate for Republicans and a dream for Democrats.

  • http://www.darnellclayton.com Darnell Clayton

    “Problematic?” More like catastrophic! Mitt is far more polished than his rivals, but his lack of conviction on issues is going to hurt the GOP if he wins the nomination.

    Obama will be able to take Obamacare off the table, and hammer Mitt about foreign policy which is Romney’s weak spot (remember the “call my lawyers” comment when it came to bombing Iran? Compare and contrast that with Obama’s “I killed Osama” and Barack leaps ahead in 2012).

    Cain is (more or less) a conservative version of Barack (an eloquent speaker with a thin resume) and unless Perry can get his rear into gear, we might have to prepare for a second term of Obama.

  • Anonymous

    Your analysis is spot on Darnell. Your thoughts mirror my own. 

  • Efudd

    Mitt is problematic, to say the least, he has lots of flip flops, high negatives  and will never win against Obama.  Mitt is McCain all over again, remember, they said McCain was the only one that could win, why would we listen to them now?   Herman Cain, I think, is the only one in the field that can win against Obama.  I disagree that his resume is thin, it’s just not in politics, which to me is a good thing.  Look where we have gotten with the professional politics type people. Dem and Rep have to carried us to the same place, and none of them have a back bone.  I think that Obama fears Cain the most, they could be behind the sex charge. Obama attacked Mitt “head on” to give the impression that he fears him; thinking this will help Mitt get the nomination. Mitt is the one Obama wants to run against.  Obama has all the attacks ready for mitt once the election starts. If Cain bring nothing to the office but his positive attitude and love of america that will help turn this country around.   But I know he will bring a lot more.  Ask yourself why the sex story now? Who brought it out?

  • Cicero

    Efudd:  Cain’s camp is saying it was Perry’s guys who “brung it up.”  Could be.  One day we’ll know, I’m sure.
    Meanwhile the total destruction of our nation continues apace, via “Executive Order” (read:  dictatorial fiat with the force of law behind it), the OWS morons (most of whom appear to be richer, or at least their families so appear, than anyone they’re protesting against), which Obummer loves (Chaos!), and a mental patient in charge of the (soon to be dismantled) U.S. Senate (amongst other wonderful things; ain’t hope and change great?).
    Perhaps the so-called lady’s lawyer will blabber out the entire settlement agreement (when he can put his hands on a copy), in contravention of the terms of the settlement, and we’ll finally know what (allegedly) happened between the “lady” and Mr. Cain (not a big Cain supporter, understand, but I’d vote for him in an instant against the Campaigner-in-Chief).